WordWolf

The "from birth to the corps" papers were initially all to help vpw figure out who he could most successfully rape. It was only later that other uses, like possible blackmail, may have come up. Personally, I think I would have submitted a paper that was carefully written and 100% lies. After all, if they really need to know, I can't fool God- they'd get revelation on what I wrote. (And that was my thinking BEFORE all this! Aren't they glad I never signed up?)

Starr Daily had a goal, and, as such, he partly described sin correctly, and partly did not. Starr Daily was more about turning your life around- but he light-pedaled REPENTING. A genuine knowledge that you did wrong, regret you did, and asking for forgiveness, as well as an attempt to do better. If the wrong person reads what he wrote (like vpw), then it becomes a matter of "change your thinking and sin becomes grace". Also, when one sins, one does "miss the mark", but that's not ALL there is to sin. By reducing it to that, vpw made it easier to dismiss. Then, when vpw soften sin further to "BROKEN FELLOWSHIP" - a CONSEQUENCE of sin but not the sin itself- then it became easy to MECHANICALLY remove sin from one's THINKING. One need not dwell CONTINUOUSLY on the problem of sin and of sinning, but the opposite is at least as bad- being unaware one is even sinning. It's easy put one's conscience to sleep this way- and vpw sure did.

Take it, George.

That's a shame, because he had so many roles, some in television, some in movies. In television, I also remember him as a kid on an episode of the Odd Couple (Randy Grainger was in the Big Brother project), and his roles in the Austin Powers movies should be remembered if ONLY for their names (Peter, Johnson...) and the scenes in which they occur (Johnson, in particular, is named to gales of laughter.)

Wild swing here- "Jake and the Fatman"?????

Well, didn't the Beatles base "Yellow Submarine" on it, or something?

vpw often claimed to hear special revelation from God- then recite some NONSENSE he got from some weird fringe group like the John Birch Society. vpw was believed because he had conned people into thinking he heard from God Almighty. All of that was based on integrity which he didn't have, skill which he plagiarized, and lies that he'd heard from God Almighty in 1942. If not for all of those, the foolish cabal drivel would not have been given a second thought, let alone taken seriously. The lies and the plagiarism MATTER. The broken integrity and the lack of character MATTER. The counterfeited authority MATTERED.

As Raf said so long ago, a truth from the pen of a plagiarist is still true. HOWEVER, plagiarism matters. Plagiarism goes to the character of the plagiarist. Every time vpw said something without directly supporting it- and that was most of the things he said- it rests on HIS "authority" - which is based on his INTEGRITY and his substance. A plagiarist has LITTLE TO NO INTEGRITY. vpw told people all kinds of things, which they took as coming from God Almighty because vpw said so or because he insinuated it- all of which rested on his nonexistent integrity. So, all of "his work" should be approached with a LOT more skepticism because it's clear it was all the compilation of a plagiarist serving HIMSELF, not someone special serving God Almighty. Once that scrutiny is actually applied, the wheels start coming off and all the errors, mistakes, and so on become clearer. With one ASSUMING vpw was correct because one was taught he heard from God Almighty, none of that is going to be examined, which means error will remain hidden.

Coming back to this post..... Ok, so, agreed the snow story was made-up, a lie, and devoid of authority. "His stuff wasn't original, so I believe his main job was compiling, organizing in one package." Where do you get the idea that he had that as any kind of "job"? Oh, right, because he said so. But he's a proven LIAR. Any CLAIMS of his are VOID because he's a proven liar. He's an unreliable source. So, any such CLAIMS would have to be supported some other way other than "that liar insisted that was his job." There's another assumption here- that he was "receiving revelation and taking action on it." The only reason to think he was doing THAT was to do his ALLEGED "JOB", and the only reason to think that was his "job" was that a proven liar SAID IT WAS. So, going back to "he would have had to be in fellowship with the Father at those times he was doing the word"...... All of this is BACKWARDS. it is ASSUMED he got a job from God- which was disproven. It is ASSUMED that this (disproven) job meant he had to compile and organize into a package. It is ASSUMED that to do this (disproven) job meant he had to receive revelation and act on it. It is ASSUMED that to do this (disproven) job meant he "was in fellowship with God" part of the time. All of those assumptions, and all of them based on a disproven point- a disproven claim that he was given a task from God, which he outlined. When your initial assumption is garbage, EVERYTHING proceeding from it is useless. It is error. It may be error that feels comfortable, but that makes it OLD error, not any less an actual ERROR.

There was ONE BOOK. It SUPPOSEDLY was about training a dog by punishing him heavily when he disobeyed and rewarding him a little if he obeyed. vpw said that same book was good for raising dogs, and for raising children. vpw knew nothing about doing either. He'd done little of either, and was bad at both. Nobody would have taken him seriously, except the lies that claimed he had a God-given authority had deceived people.

But.... vpw NEVER RAISED HIS DOGS! He farmed out all the work with the dogs to someone else on grounds. He also farmed out all the work on his kids. And people still take him seriously on the subject of training or raising EITHER.

The book was "HUNT CLOSE." I've heard it says to reward a dog who does the right thing, and punish him heavily for every wrong thing. it's been disavowed by RESPECTED dog trainers because that results in a dog that behaves AS LONG AS THE TRAINER IS WATCHING. The idea of using that to raise a kid when it's inappropriate to even use on a DOG is disquieting, to say the least.

vpw set it up that way on purpose because he'd already gotten caught boinking the church secretary and was ousted as a result. So, the next time, he specifically set up a group where he couldn't get ousted for boinking anyone.

When R@m0n@ was married to T0M M1tch311, that came up also. That is, lcm was boinking R@m0n@. T0M got into an argument with her about it. Someone overheard him shout that he couldn't compete with lcm. He set up to leave the grounds immediately, and begged her to come along. When lcm got wind of this, he sent someone R2m0n@ respected to talk her into staying. When she chose to stay, T0m responded by blowing his own brains out on campus with a gun. Naturally, they put it all on T0m, and told R@m0n@ that if she had chosen to go with him, T0m would have shot her and himself. So, yeah, lcm was partly responsible for T0M's death. Not that I think he was a great guy, but he didn't deserve what he got.

Yet.... even you admit that he made up a snow story. That was blatantly dishonest. That was deceit, that was lying. To any sensible person, that speaks POORLY of his CREDIBILITY. Then when he speaks about God, a SENSIBLE person should remember his credibility was shot and remain skeptical. In twi, however, it's "never question vpw." That's not sensible.

"DODGE, DENY, DISTRACT, BUT NEVER ADMIT AN ERROR IS AN ERROR." - MIKE. I'm sure, later, Mike regretted being that up-front for once about his methods. It was remarkably candid about having a blatantly dishonest approach.

vpw claimed that "Christian" was a corruption of "Christ-in", and that Christians were originally called that because they talked about Christ-in. As always, he was wrong. The man never studied Church history, he studied how to give sermons. In hindsight, it was ridiculous to trust him on anything of substance- Bible languages, Church history..... vpw claimed the early Christians in Acts were called "followers of The Way", with Jesus Christ being "The Way." Naturally, they're into their congregation being called their "FOLLOWERS" and herding them like sheep....and fleecing them like sheep.

Before someone pretends vpw had nothing to do with it, I'm in with.... vpw set the stage for this and vpw planned it all. This was the man who privately told people that God Almighty was OK with ORGIES, and apparently always wanted to attend one since he kept trying to get details of them and hung out where he thought they happened. He also set up an elaborate network where he could target women in twi- he used the "From the Birth to the Corps" papers to find his targets, and was even seen with their paper in his hand when he targeted them. He set up places remote from his home where he had an office AND A PLACE TO SLEEP. That's where he had women-whom he'd carefully selected- sent. Sometimes he drugged them, other times he just plied them with alcohol (lowered inhibitions). And if they looked like they were going to spill the beans or tell someone, the women were kicked out of twi and rushed off campus, and put on a slow bus back home. Meanwhile, as soon as they were off-campus, their name was slandered all over campus, and phone calls were made slandering her back home, and she was made, if possible, to feel like a big failure to God Almighty. Small wonder at least one woman kicked out committed suicide. This was not "and when women threw themselves at him, he sinned." This was "he set up the places to sin, carefully selected sin's targets, drugged women to make it easier to sin, and destroyed their reputations if it looked like they had regrets." To paraphrase George Carlin, it was a sin for vpw to want to rape Maggie Muggins, it was a sin for vpw to plan to rape Maggie Muggins, it was a sin for vpw to set up a place to rape Maggie Muggins, it was a sin for vpw to try to rape Maggie Muggins, and it was a sin for vpw to rape Maggie Muggins. I brought that up once before. One vpw defender came away with saying "the RCC has a lot of categories of sins" and never once said "that was a lot of DELIBERATE DECISIONS vpw made in order to rape ONE woman, let alone MANY."

Ok, now that sounds familiar. "Midnight Rider." I think that's the Allman Brothers.

Sure I'll pray for it. A church that reaches out to their community- I prefer those to the twi method of "Serve us and us only."

"We're all part of the Gnomish Space Marines, Gnomish Space Marines, Gnomish Space Marines." https://gnomish-space-marines.obsidianportal.com/

I thought Ex-C reported something to that effect as well. Perhaps I was wrong.

That's it.

You might as well post the answer, George.