GarthP2000

Raf after munching on pineapple pizza. :D-->

Now I am quite the tolerant fellow when it comes to pizza, and what goes on it (MUCH to Raf's purist chagrin ;)-->), ..... BUT, when Spam (((shudder))) is added to the mix here, ... Hey, I'm sorry, but *something* has gotta GO. And that Spam, complete with that geletin *gunk* that comes with it? :o--> I mean, we're talking flagerant EPA violations here. Chemical weapons of mass destruction! :)-->

Raf, ya wanna inflict---errr, tell him? Or should I?

Raf, So-o-o, if its made/served in Puerto RicoMexico/anywhere else in Latin America, its not pizza there either, ... is it? :D-->

ROFLMAO!!!! :D-->

Excy, (Homer Simpson mode on) mmmMMMMMMMmmmmmmmm!! Pineapple pizza-a-a-a!!! MMMMMMMMMMMMMM ... ((droool)) (Homer Simpson mode off) (Smikeol mode on) my preciousssssss (Smikeol mode off)

Oldies, Remember, you are in the 21st century. ... A.D., not B.C.!! As far as I'm concerned, that Andrea Yates shouldn't take the responsibility for knowingly drowning her kids, mental state notwithstanding, the jury is still out on that one. She knew what she was doing as far as the actions were concerned; ie., she knew that she was killing them by drowning them. That alone keeps me from jumping on the 'poor Andrea. She didn't realize what she was doing' bandwagon. (Oh, did or did not the defense bring up their own expert psychiatric witness clearly showing that Andrea was insane and couldn't understand her actions?) This is exactly why the insanity defense is very difficult to use in trials like this. It should and ought to be so. But like I said, the jury is still out, ... so they should have a new trial, *sans* the 'creative' expert witness from Law and Order. -->

..... pineapples are our precioussssss. :D-->

Geeezz, what is it with you and pineapples, anyway? --> Have a bad experience with Hawaii Five-O? Hawaiian Punch go down the wrong pipe? Get a stickly from a fresh pineapple? I know. One of them pretty lai girls wouldn't go out with ya to the prom? :D--> Say it with us, Raf. ... Pineapples on pizza. ..... YUUMMMmmmmm! :P-->

That's right. Gotta go to a high brow source for genuine pizza. Dominoes. Home of the pinapple and ham PIZZA. :D-->

Galen, Ya know, you'd make a wierd Santa Claus. :D-->

Galen, Since when did lesbians sport beards? :D-->

I think Dan mentioned something about the anti-homosexual part in Romans 1 being missing in the earlier copies predating that change in Roman society. Dan, you have any reference to this item?

So why then is the evidence/results/facts in real life not conducive according to the aforementioned 'biblical injunction'? Where is the verifiable negative results that have been proven to result directly from homosexuality. Like the so-called threat to the family unit and marriage. How has that 'threat' been proven true? See, thats the essense of things real and true. The results are according to the claim. ... And not just based on "It is Written" and that's it.

No. Only if you have a hot dog w/o a bun with condiments. Now THAT is wrong. Thus speakest Hank! :D-->

I take it Jonny's posts have been 'excised', since I don't see any of them.

uh ohhh .... this sounds like a THE spinoff in the works. Who wants to be its Prophet? :D-->

Galen, Point taken (especially the one about Windows XP :D--> ) Thanks for the further info.

Johniam, In terror? ..... uhh ok, whatever. --> Is this your attempt at 'spiritual perception'? ... I've seen LCM do better. Why is it that when I (and other non-orthodox posters) post our viewpoints on the matter, it is 'not minding our own business' and 'being thought policeman'? Yet you post with just as much conviction what your viewpoint is, and if somebody makes the same accusation against you, I know you would heatedly deny it, and/or whine about being persecuted and 'Christians not being able to speak freely'. Just be honest about it, ok? You don't like what I post cause it contradicts what you believe. Simple. And I know this to be the case because I used to believe the same way. People who dared to speak things contrary to 'The Word of GOD' were committing a grave offense, and should be stopped, etc., etc. That was our 'spiritual perception', due to our own sense that WE had The Truth. A viewpoint which you are legally and socially entitled to. Just as I am legally and socially entitled to my viewpoints. No more, and no less. So chill out, and Happy New Year!

Which succinctly depicts why I abandoned that kind of mindset, .... and haven't looked back.

Johniam, Thanks for the window cleaning offer, but no thanks. I like good, quality work by professionals, thank you very much. :D-->

Yeah, you're right. It was a bad comparison. Mea culpa. Besides, there are already enough valid cheap shots at TWI apologists as it is without me having to make more up, right? :D-->

Just an observation, Linda, just an observation. Read what I said again. I didn't say that ALL window washers were TWI apologists, but it *seemed* to me that just about all TWI apologists were window washers. Note the difference. But, like you illustrated, thats neither here nor there. Peace.

And as an aside, has anybody here noticed that just about every ex-TWIer who still has a very positive opinion of VPW and/or PFAL are all window cleaners? Not that there is anything wrong with the work itself, but that kind of work was pretty popular with Wayfers back during the glory days of TWI. (As well as being the kind of work that didn't require any kind of higher education. ;)-->) I wonder why that's so, hmmm?

Johniam, Well its so cool that your discriminating views against gays stop when it comes to the almighty dollar. You think that they are spiritual scum, yet you have no qualms about working for their money. What would you think about a liberal who trashes conservatives, yet has no qualms about working for their money, hmmm? Kinda gives a new meaning to "the buck stops here" now, doesn't it? --> Oh by the way, isn't it also one of God's Edicts that you don't do business with the ungodly? (You know, the unbeliever, the atheist, the homo, et al) Like to know how many verses I can pull from the bible showing that 'principle'?