
Nathan_Jr
Members-
Posts
3,056 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
72
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by Nathan_Jr
-
I do. How (H-O-W) does ababababa explain how (H-O-W) the Biblical canon was formed?
- 702 replies
-
- novelty
- hermeneutics
- (and 8 more)
-
A more accurate question according to the scientific precision of usage is: WITAF does abababababa have to do with the how the Biblical canon was formed???
- 702 replies
-
- novelty
- hermeneutics
- (and 8 more)
-
A literary or scriptural work is not written with canonical member status in mind. A literary or scriptural work may not refer nor validate itself for inclusion in the canon.
- 702 replies
-
- novelty
- hermeneutics
- (and 8 more)
-
The following definitions of Canon are to be carefully considered and understood before posting on this topic. Canon has other definitions, but these are applicable in this context. These are relevant definitions for here and now. Canon New Oxford American Dictionary noun A collection or list of sacred books accepted as genuine the works of a particular author or artist that are recognized as genuine. the list of works considered to be permanently established as being of the highest quality Canon Cambridge Dictionary noun The writings or other works that are generally agreed to be good, important, and worth studying. Canon Merriam-Webster Dictionary noun a: an authoritative list of books accepted as Holy Scripture b: the authentic works of a writer c: a sanctioned or accepted group or body of related works
- 702 replies
-
- novelty
- hermeneutics
- (and 8 more)
-
- 702 replies
-
- novelty
- hermeneutics
- (and 8 more)
-
- 702 replies
-
- novelty
- hermeneutics
- (and 8 more)
-
But it's not knowledge at all. It's belief. Or as you've seen me render it more accurately according to scientifically precise usage as seen through spiritual binoculars: BELEEF. It's a pseudo knowledge. BELEEF takes the place of absent knowledge. One cannot believe one's way to knowing. victor wants you to BLEEVE that you know that you know that you know. BELEEVING is not knowing. A higher knowledge is available. It can be seen, but it can't be described. It is nothing to be possessed. Anyone who claims to have it is the one who most certainly does not. ALL scripture (not just ancient Near Eastern) POINTS to that which cannot be named. But the pointer itself is not the knowledge, the Truth. Christ said KNOW the Truth. BELEEF has no place where Truth is concerned. The paradox is spiritual knowledge is available once one has wiped away all knowledge and belief. It cannot be found in a class. Only a completely free mind can perceive the Truth pointed to in scripture. Another cannot perceive it for you. This is the childlike mind. Not childish. Childlike. A child's mind is not yet filled with belief and knowledge; rather, a child's mind is empty and free to be in awe of God.
-
Uh-oh
-
Thanks, Mark. In other words, it's a man-made private interpretation?
-
Thanks, Mark. I thought this had been mentioned. My thought was first, your post was second - the second time establishes it! Hey! I didn't write the book. Perhaps there's some phrasing in the Bible detailing the required replacement of God's only begotten.. Or the desired replacement. Or the necessary replacement. Specifically, where in the Bible does it say that the Bible+Christ-in-you+believing+renewed-mind shall replace God's only begotten? You have the software it might be easier for you to find.
-
Lord's Year or Year of the Lord = Anno Domini Our = Nostri
-
An error in translation? Translation? Did he mean compilation? Or composition? Or assembly? It may seem like a minor error, but in the context of assertions of mathematical accuracy, scientific precision, and tailor-made gloves, these mark misses matter. Either victor starts saying what he means and meaning what he says or else this whole PFAL thing will just fall to pieces.... oh... wait...
- 702 replies
-
- novelty
- hermeneutics
- (and 8 more)
-
What is the literal meaning of the Latin phrase Anno Domini?
-
I don't know.
-
I can assure you, you have no clear perception whatsoever what I can or want to understand. Your perceptions are dead wrong. You continue with your assumptions. You continue with your accusations. Like the accuser. I would proceed with caution, if I were you.
-
Sounds like this is an answer to one of my many question you've evaded. Where is God? He's far away, up there? NOT a trick question. If that's your answer, ok. I'm just trying to understand. I don't like making assumptions.
-
Thanks for the clarification. Is this you final answer? Is this what the Word is? Remember, the question I've asked so many times: What is the Word? it's NOT a trick question. If this is your final answer, fine. If not, add what is missing, and please get back to me with the final answer to What is the Word?
-
That's not even close to what Anno Domini means. Victor proved in one of the PFAL sessions that he didn't understand Latin, either. How can our lord watch over us if he's absent. That doesn't even make sense. And if it doesn't fit, it's not true to fact.
-
H-O-W ...just, you know, for those who don't know how (H-O-W) to spell how. This is a lesson on how (H-O-W). And devil spirits. It's a lesson on how (H-O-W) to fetishize devil spirits. How (H-O-W) to turn away from God after taking a dump in His mouth and place all your attention on devil spirits. Victor's way. Hey! I didn't write the book. It worked for Victor.... oh... wait...
-
So, the letters of Paul mixed with believing replace the ascended Nazarene. More accurately, according to usage, literally, victor's interpretation of the letters of Paul replace the only begotten of God, if you believe it.
-
Literally all of this. We have much in common.
-
I actually learned how to play in upstate New York at summer camp! It's such a simple game of pure leisure. Lawn bowling. Its origins can be traced back to Ancient Rome. I always had this romantic fantasy of old Italian men playing bocce while drinking wine from juice cups. I tried my best to live that out in my twenties and thirties. BUT, today it's a metaphor for something else entirely.
-
-
Thanks, Mike, for that direct answer: Primarily Paul's epistles. Please answer my follow up question.
-
What about all those scrolls of the Septuagint that Paul was so adamant Timothy retrieve? Those were Old Testament scrolls. Paul taught from those scriptures. Any time "scripture" is mentioned in any epistles the meaning is individual and collected writings that would eventually be known as the Hebrew Bible. Is the Hebrew Bible the word?