Nathan_Jr

Ok. Reject it. You do you. Isn't the Bible a collection of writings (literature) written by men (except Hebrews) who were inspired by God? Is this what you are rejecting?

Huh??? The author's interpretations of his own writing? Do you mean to use the word meaning everywhere you are using the word interpretation? Hopefully, this hypothetical technical book is written with greater clarity and plainer language than this paragraph. Slow down, Mike. Gather your thoughts, SIT, write a structured outline and begin again.

Scripture is a type/genre of literature, within which are sub-genres like apocalypse, poetry, hymns, prophesy, narrative…

80. Scripture STILL doesn’t interpret itself. This wonderful kernel was established thousands of years ago. (The 2nd time did it.) Today it was reaffirmed.

I rest my case.

Is this evidence sufficient? ababababa

*figger

Does the Bible read itself?

Does the Bible read itself?

Super secret my a$$ pennies! I'm calling bullshonta.

I said it before in the other thread on classes that suck, and it's worth saying again. One of the many hundreds of flaws in the excellor classes is the omission of how (H-O-W) to inflect an interrogative while SIT. For example: Lo shonta?

One would think that, but all my inner man can do is stuff envelopes and lick stamps - the letters write themselves.

Hallelujah In Kuala Lumpur Mogadishu

A. I think you’re on to something lo shonta. B. The scriptures work themselves. A. The DVD plays itself B. The class watches itself A. The international country franchises itself. B. And the tithe sends itself in. A.

Mmmmmph

79. Working the word. How can one work it if it can't be interpreted? It can't be interpreted because it interprets itself. THEREFORE, the word works itself. No one can work the scriptures. The scriptures work themselves. Lo shonta?

Bullshonta is just a beautiful way as originally intended by the Aramaic to say bull-mf’n-$hit. It’s also just a wonderfully beautiful way to describe every utterance out of the filthy little mouth of victor paul wierwille.

Does the Bible read itself?

The Bible interprets itself is not a beautiful way of saying anything at all. That's not even what victor said. It's certainly not what he meant. Not even close. Does the Bible read itself?

Does the Bible read itself? This is not a new topic. It is directly related to the Bible interpreting itself.

Does the Bible read itself?

At least three histories have already been written. They have totally avoided any style that could be called whitewashing. I'm thinking of Kahler, Skedgell and Edge. I'm hoping Rocky or Skyrider write one soon.

78. victor made up his own definitions of words to advance his agenda. He changed the meaning of words in English, Greek, Latin, Hebrew. Sometimes he would change them because he simply didn't understand. Sometimes he would change the definition of a word to support an impossibly stupid asserted claim. For example: he changed the meaning of the word interpret to fit his private agenda. He distorted the meaning to MAKE it fit....like a hand in a...

That's right, Mike. That's riiiight. I started this thread for you to explain your proposition that the Bible canonizes itself.

Does the Bible read itself?