Nathan_Jr
-
Posts
3,059 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
72
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by Nathan_Jr
-
Mmmmph
-
I find it hard to beleeve it could be more effd up than what he wrote.
-
Excellent, T-Bone. A lot to unpack here. All of it so important. So much. For now, I want to highlight one item that is probably always missed. It's subtle, cunning and sinister. May we as members of Christ’s Body become so filled with love that we may be teachable and have our hearts opened to His Holy Word. Is this what it means to be so filled with love? Teachable? What does it mean to be teachable? What does he mean by teachable? The intended meaning. I've pointed to this problem of indoctrination more than any other over the past ten months. I think this is one of the most important issues facing mankind today. We are all so eager to get taught, and teachers are so eager to teach, but no one is interested in how to learn, how to find out. It seems no one is paying attention. The mouth is open, but no one is inspecting the spoon. I don't know what else to say at this moment. I pray that everyone will deeply contemplate what this means. Understand the intended meaning. It is implicit. It is subtle. It is dark. Great post, T-Bone. A lot going on here. Thanks.
-
This is a really nice summary of a complex subject, OS. Well done. I missed it this morning because I was so shaken by the rape apologetics from Oldies.
-
Yeah. The bank and, well....
-
Ha! Kinda, but worse.
-
Then your knowledge will be limited to what your teacher taught you. There are other ways to know, to learn.
-
Try writing for clarity. The confusion starts with how you compose a sentence. Understand what words mean. Meanings of words must be established and accepted by all parties communicating. To interpret is to provide meaning. So, to interpret a meaning is a cumbersome redundancy. Hey! I didn't write your sentences.
-
Are those the two major attitudes?
-
85. Chinqualla Bo Shay
-
84. It teaches that with enough fudging, forced fitting, linguistic acrobatics and exegetical magic tricks, anyone came make the Bible say and mean anything all to fit one's personal, private agenda.
-
83. Extreme closeups of the thief's face in the last session.
-
Sorry if this has already been posted by someone, but when I ate a cookie, I got this revelation for the 2nd time, so it's established according to the cartoon: 82: Buckets and buckets of bullshonta.
-
81. Gloves
-
Also, something about SIT is a prerequisite for revelation. Keys to walking something something. There was a cartoon that proved it. shabba shabba kilimanjaro lo shonta
-
He does?
-
Again, no answer to my questions. As usual. What are you so afraid of? I'll try to ask it another way. An author writes something. In order for the author to understand what he means, he must interpret himself? So the author is doing double work because he couldn't write what he meant, nor understand what he meant the first time? He had to interpret what he meant? Huh? What kind of author does this? One who hasn't slept in weeks because of a meth binge? A paranoid schizophrenic?
-
The phrasing is so awkward, ineffectual. The author interprets what he meant? Why would an author need or want to do this. Doesn't the (skilled) author say what he means? When would one ever interpret what they meant? Your word choice isn't working. Can you rewrite this for clarity?
-
No one needs or wants the priest who rapes. Christ doesn't. The boy with the torn rectum doesn't. Let the priests stop with the child f… king.
-
Does the priest have faith in Christ while raping the child? I'll bet he will assure you that he does. He probably has something to teach you, too. All the teaching. All the raping. All the evil.
-
Sodomitic session sounds like something one might register and make an appointment for. No child signs up for rape. The linguistic acrobatics of rape apologetics are evil.
- 702 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- novelty
- hermeneutics
- (and 8 more)
-
The questions are rhetorical. Of course, Christ doesn't require ceremony and ritual to do his work. Indeed, his presence is completely substantial. Let all churches dispense with the antiseptic verbiage of rape apologetics. Let them allow Christ to work through them so that they never again commit the linguistic crime that is "sodomitic session." Let the priestly class stop obfuscating and condescending. Let them describe their activities as they are: Rape.
- 702 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- novelty
- hermeneutics
- (and 8 more)
-
Literally, according to usage, the priest is raping the alter boy. Christ is there? Isn't he absent? Faith? Like believing faith? Or the measure of faith that we have?
-
Not rude at all. Mike is hopelessly spinning on the hamster wheel of PFAL. His spinning is evidence in favor of this thread's proposition - that PFAL sucks.
-
Why?
