Nathan_Jr
-
Posts
2,989 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
67
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by Nathan_Jr
-
No one needs or wants the priest who rapes. Christ doesn't. The boy with the torn rectum doesn't. Let the priests stop with the child f… king.
-
Does the priest have faith in Christ while raping the child? I'll bet he will assure you that he does. He probably has something to teach you, too. All the teaching. All the raping. All the evil.
-
Sodomitic session sounds like something one might register and make an appointment for. No child signs up for rape. The linguistic acrobatics of rape apologetics are evil.
- 702 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- novelty
- hermeneutics
- (and 8 more)
-
The questions are rhetorical. Of course, Christ doesn't require ceremony and ritual to do his work. Indeed, his presence is completely substantial. Let all churches dispense with the antiseptic verbiage of rape apologetics. Let them allow Christ to work through them so that they never again commit the linguistic crime that is "sodomitic session." Let the priestly class stop obfuscating and condescending. Let them describe their activities as they are: Rape.
- 702 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- novelty
- hermeneutics
- (and 8 more)
-
Literally, according to usage, the priest is raping the alter boy. Christ is there? Isn't he absent? Faith? Like believing faith? Or the measure of faith that we have?
-
Not rude at all. Mike is hopelessly spinning on the hamster wheel of PFAL. His spinning is evidence in favor of this thread's proposition - that PFAL sucks.
-
Why?
-
I'd say Lo Shonta to this, but it just wouldn't cover it. This excerpt can stand alone without comment.
-
Ok. Reject it. You do you. Isn't the Bible a collection of writings (literature) written by men (except Hebrews) who were inspired by God? Is this what you are rejecting?
-
Huh??? The author's interpretations of his own writing? Do you mean to use the word meaning everywhere you are using the word interpretation? Hopefully, this hypothetical technical book is written with greater clarity and plainer language than this paragraph. Slow down, Mike. Gather your thoughts, SIT, write a structured outline and begin again.
-
Scripture is a type/genre of literature, within which are sub-genres like apocalypse, poetry, hymns, prophesy, narrative…
-
80. Scripture STILL doesn’t interpret itself. This wonderful kernel was established thousands of years ago. (The 2nd time did it.) Today it was reaffirmed.
-
I rest my case.
-
Is this evidence sufficient? ababababa
-
*figger
-
Does the Bible read itself?
-
Does the Bible read itself?
-
Super secret my a$$ pennies! I'm calling bullshonta.
-
I said it before in the other thread on classes that suck, and it's worth saying again. One of the many hundreds of flaws in the excellor classes is the omission of how (H-O-W) to inflect an interrogative while SIT. For example: Lo shonta?
-
One would think that, but all my inner man can do is stuff envelopes and lick stamps - the letters write themselves.
-
Hallelujah In Kuala Lumpur Mogadishu
-
A. I think you’re on to something lo shonta. B. The scriptures work themselves. A. The DVD plays itself B. The class watches itself A. The international country franchises itself. B. And the tithe sends itself in. A.
-
Mmmmmph
-
79. Working the word. How can one work it if it can't be interpreted? It can't be interpreted because it interprets itself. THEREFORE, the word works itself. No one can work the scriptures. The scriptures work themselves. Lo shonta?
-
Bullshonta is just a beautiful way as originally intended by the Aramaic to say bull-mf’n-$hit. It’s also just a wonderfully beautiful way to describe every utterance out of the filthy little mouth of victor paul wierwille.
