Nathan_Jr

I never claimed to know anything about him. That’s why I asked. Not projecting at all. Merely saying what YOU made him SOUND like. Like a SUPERSTAR researcher? I have read the paper. Did he ever super research his way into discovery of the error that is four crucified? Or any of the hundreds of victor’s errors?

Schoenheit has it? He is the arbiter? He has the Truth?

The primary and lasting error of victor paul wierwille's "ministry" is that the Truth is something to be possessed, and victor is the one who has it, and you, too, can have it if you only imitate him and stand on his shoulders. A wicked deception.

Why? How could they when they were conditioned to not go beyond what the charlatan taught?

A temporary sheltering of the truth? A postponed disillusionment? Wow. The progressive, far left woke want the same thing. Hiding uncomfortable truth deprives people from learning how to deal with and understand it. This is ALWAYS a bad strategy, because truth will always, eventually, emerge. Then what? You are left with people Ill equipped to handle the truth.

How would he have known? Why would he be the one that would have known? He did? That's his opinion. You make him sound like someone with a lack of in depth perception and awareness.

It was the DOCTRINES of victor paul wierwille that imitators used to justify their sin.

Sheltering students from any fact or truth NEVER has has merits, especially when a "teacher" claims to be trustworthy. A balance of openness and coverup? A wicked proposition. Only a deceiver would need to to strike this balance. Honesty, transparency, truth telling are not liabilities requiring a mitigation strategy.

All these dependent clauses and prepositional phrases! Yikes! History is not written by committee, propaganda is. Correction: This place is thorough in the gathering of objective historical FACTS. These facts have been objectively and subjectively judged to be mostly negative. Lies and exaggerations are asserted. Those assertions are dealt with and corrected and sometimes even mocked. This is called propaganda.

Is that what VP himself wrote? You think this is some kind of profound insight? It’s not. This has been obvious to virtually every human being for at least 100,000 years.

Is it? EVERY post? Not so fast! Some posts are pure fact, some are pure opinion, some are pure speculation; Some are a mix of only fact and opinion; others are speculation and opinion, but no facts. What does that mean? The word = YourWalk+YourBelieving+TheBible+ChristInYou? That "ministry" taught a great deal of factual error, silly opinion and outrageous speculation. I hope you know you can go far beyond what you were taught, if you want. TOO bullying and controlling? When those in your life get bullying and controlling AT ALL, you have to stand up to them. Those controlling bullies were imitating and standing on the shoulders of victor paul wierwille.

What does that mean? What is a spiritual heavyweight? Who "taught" you that term?

Right. Men and women are not treated as equals in the OT, as prescribed by law. It's not even close. Just wanted to make sure you weren't confused about this.

That the wives were all treated equally by the husband? No favoritism was to be given one wife over another? Certainly, you don’t mean treated as equal to the husband.

Brilliant! mmmmmph

Are there charts? Charts, please. Charts made by the Art Department, please.

And it's sufficiently, precisely, accurately called serial monogamy. It's only misleading if you don't understand what it means. No need to make up new terms, because it won't be helpful. Use a dictionary. (1) Single; Eligible; Unmarried (2) Monogamy (3) Polygamy They aren't sloppy at all. They may only be unclear to you. They really aren't misleading. Use a dictionary.

Right. Research does not mean re-search. At least, it hasn't meant that for a few hundred years. You can, contrary to what victor paul wierwille claims, go beyond what you've been taught. Far beyond.

So much devil spirit, so little God.

Right

I wonder what his mom and brothers called him? The letter J did not exist in the 1st century. So much for getting back to the original. Bless his little heart....

A case could be made that polygamy requires more commitment. More wives, more commitment. I don’t think victor paul wierwille would have been willing to be bothered with that level of commitment and responsibility. One wife and a bowl of Quaaludes for the girls is easier and cheaper.

Right. I suspected that’s what you meant. Yeah, baseball, apple pie, Delta blues, divorce — Americana. What a thought experiment. I don’t think polygamy would have curtailed his predation or his craving for power, control and young leg. If polygamy was the norm, victor paul wierwille would practice monogamous marriage as a display of novel contrarianism.

I can’t even do it in series. Or else, I’m unwilling. At this moment, I don’t beleeeve in marriage for myself. Not even one at a time. What was the legislation?