Nathan_Jr

As WordWolf points out, victor was WAY off on this. Not even close. If a "doctor" could be so, so inaccurate about how (H-O-W) we got the Bible, what other egregious errors might he spew? Anyone can find out. Test all things.

Thanks. So, words interpret themselves? Great. I'll start working that key to test for its efficacy.

Fair enough. Let's see if Mike can get honest with his answers. We've asked honest questions. Can you answer me this: Are we talking about the keys to words interpreting themselves?

Keys to how words interpret themselves? Seriously. Just trying to understand. Help a brotha out, please.

You have yet to mention details. This is not a gotcha. It’s a simple question. What are your methods?

Not an answer. What are the methods?

What methods of probing are acceptable to you?

Does no one see a distinction between what is known and what is believed? Between certainty and probability?

As in Luke 23:43? The criminal would be unconscious in paradise with the master?

Really? Are we not talking about heuristics and epistemology? How (H-O-W) we know or don’t know? My question is right on topic. I’ve seen this deflective tactic before. I’m not disappointed, because I don’t expect more from you.

A. Always B. Be C. Closing

You can upvote it seven times, if you can beleeeve big enough. Got oil?

To get you started.... Confirmation bias, a phrase coined by English psychologist Peter Wason, is the tendency of people to favor information that confirms or strengthens their beliefs or values and is difficult to dislodge once affirmed.[2] Confirmation bias is an example of a cognitive bias. Some psychologists restrict the term "confirmation bias" to selective collection of evidence that supports what one already believes while ignoring or rejecting evidence that supports a different conclusion. Others apply the term more broadly to the tendency to preserve one's existing beliefs when searching for evidence, interpreting it, or recalling it from memory.[6] Confirmation bias is a result of automatic, unintentional strategies rather than deliberate deception.[8][9] Confirmation bias cannot be avoided or eliminated, but only managed by improving education and critical thinking skills. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias#Definition_and_context

How do you know? Have you experienced death?

Impossibly unfair question to ask.

Either you don't understand what Kuhn meant by normal science or you are simply unable to meaningfully and accurately convey the term. And to conflate confirmation bias with normal science is a huge misunderstanding - nothing but confusion can arise by asserting this error. I can explain it all to you, but I don't have time right now. Merry Christmas

Well done, T-Bone. In a court of law intent is usually proven beyond a reasonable doubt with circumstantial evidence. Drawing inferences, even conclusions, about victor's intent based on circumstantial evidence is not unreasonable, IMO. I'm sure you already know this is not MY statistical formula. Not REALLY. It's from Anchorman. You know the scene, right?

I don’t remember that, but I believe you. What was his point? Was it an unintentional indictment of himself?

Yes. I think those two reasons are designs of the grooming. CF&S was a play called at the line of scrimmage. Not everyone could run that play. Many tried and gained some ground, like Loy. But only Victor Barnard, one of vpw’s most astute disciples, could take it all the way.

I've only seen the one loaded to Internet Archive. It's difficult to watch, like all videos of victor paul wierwille. In it he asserts several "private interpretations" of the Bible. It's a mid-70s production, I think. At that filming he is not yet out too far over his skis -- he spews bullshonta and lies like you just wouldn't believe! I've wondered WTF was the point of that "class" but for grooming of girls for future "service."

There were children in the audience when Victor showed his CF&S. T-bone has chronicled that grooming event a couple times. What is the proper time to show a video of bestiality to children?

Do you have children?

@Mike Again, post it here, as I've suggested. Or post it on a topic specific to her book. You are free to post your critique anywhere, except Roy's thread. She wasn't free to do honest research while under victor, but you are free to express your opinions.