Nathan_Jr

How does TWI's doctrinal glove of a spared Jesus on the cross fit the Christian hand of Christ crucified? What is their logic? How do they MAKE the errant Lamsa translation fit? From what do they claim Jesus was spared? Certainly not torture and execution. And how should one believe God raised Jesus from the dead if he was spared death?

I should know the answer to my own question by now, but… Really? Or are you joking?

Damn, this rocks me every time. I know you've mentioned this before, but I can't remember if your roommate was in FL with you.

Mmmph

Yes. Let it be split. Keep it in About the Way and title new thread "LCDIAZ WC 17."

Brandon is the Mind Shift pod host. Oldies was replying to Charity’s post referencing Brandon.

Probably not, but I could pretend for sake of discussion. You might need to define what you mean by God.

It’s sarcasm. Perhaps I misquoted victor.

Trying to understand. Spirits? Spirit beings? Like ghosts? Or devil spirits?

And this is the implication of Oldies’ question.

Seems like Diaz didn’t wait for the green light, which explains the wreck. Also, common sense, the least God expects. Additionally, he may not be as fluent in glossolalia as he thinks, further accounting for the derailment and crash.

Good question. Short answer, not necessarily. I don't think being atheist precludes one from accessing or perceiving the spiritual (best word available at the moment) or mystical. I've been thinking about this lately. How could I describe my position for the sake of dialogue and understanding? The labels are poorly tailored gloves. Technically, I'm atheist. I don't believe in Quetzalcoatl, Vishnu, Isis, Baal, Yahweh, Zeus, or any of the other thousands of gods that man has believed in as fervently as you do your god. And, as I may or may not have made clear, I don't believe in belief. All nontheists are atheists, but not all atheists are nontheists. (I think that's right.) For my position, nontheist is also technically correct and may be more accurate. There's probably a spectrum with this one. One might argue Christians can be nontheistic - Meister Eckhart and Thomas Merton, both Catholic monks, come to mind. Then there's pantheism and panentheism. Those may also fit in the spectrum. I would consider Taoism and Buddhism to be atheistic/nontheistic.

I knew it all along. I knew that I knew that I knew you were the hoochie coochie man.

Do you remember what it was like before you were born? How then do you know what it’s like after you die? What’s wrong with the answers “nothing” or “I don’t know”?

It's halting, isn't it? Since I'm trilingual in glossolalia, yet only bilingual in interpretation... oh, well... right... where to start?

Chow maka seetay? Hmmm... An aristocratic taste, I see.

Just one question: Lo maka seetay? https://www.theway.org/blog/new-power-for-abundant-living-today-intermediate-class/ "The eagerly anticipated Power for Abundant Living (PFAL) Today Intermediate Class is finally here! Students are already immersing themselves in this new class. The greatness of this class is that it begins to move a believer from receiving to giving. In the Foundational Class, students learn how to receive into manifestation power from on high and speak in tongues. In the Intermediate Class, students learn how to accurately and lovingly operate the worship manifestations of speaking in tongues, interpretation of tongues and prophecy, enabling the believer to give to others and build up the Church. Like its Foundational Class predecessor, the PFAL Today Intermediate Class was filmed in front of a live student audience at The Way International Headquarters on the same class set. It is presented in a more concise package, in three sessions with twelve total segments. This class is taught by three dynamic teachers—Rev. Eddie McInnis, Mrs. Chandler Greene (Liz), and Rev. Michael Cosgrove. This new addition to the PFAL Today class series will make an impactful spiritual imprint on the hearts and lives of the believers worldwide. If you’re interested in taking this class, we encourage you to reach out to your local leadership about forming a class in your area. If you haven’t connected with our ministry yet, we would love to meet you and share more! You can reach us by completing our Contact Us form. Born-again believers have received a powerful gift, the gift of holy spirit, from our heavenly Father, God. Enjoy learning more about how to put that gift into operation with the PFAL Today Intermediate Class!"

Victor taught beleeeving so the believer could be blamed. The con, the fraud, the charlatan requires beleeef. Truth does not. Belief has no place where truth is concerned.

"Eternal Now is a concept of time perception suggested by some proponents of New Age spirituality.[1] Its characteristics vary from increased awareness of the present moment to a broader, more open and holistic perception of one's subjective past and potential variants of future. The concept is consonant with and constitutes an integration and development of a number of approaches to spiritual alertness and totality of perception advocated by various forms of Buddhist philosophy (in particular Zen Buddhism) [citation needed], Shamanic practices, and other philosophical and spiritual directions, both ancient and contemporary." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_Now_(New_Age) My fellowship commander would misapply this concept, as well. He said victor coined the term, but, of course, victor did no such thing. If the word of god is an eternal now, then it's not the Bible or any version of the Bible, nor interpretation nor class nor Paul.

Hello, Irony. I've missed you!

Wow. Just… wow… …The unflinching regurgitation, the reflexive parroting. The utmost manifestation of indoctrination. Evidence of a very soft, conditioned mind. This is just creepy AF. I need a bath.

You know he wasn't a real doctor, don't you?

Moot point. Wrong administration. Unforgivable sin was TO and FOR the Judean's, remember? What would it matter anyway? Paul said all (without exception or distinction) sin is forgiven. He said God wasn't imputing sin anymore. Ask Victor or Loy. Would they agree? Besides, is the Household of God anything other than spiritual? One of the most beautiful stories in all (without exception or distinction) scripture. HOWEVER, it is in the Old Testament. It was instruction TO the Judeans. Got get your TO's and FOR's rightly divided. Again, Old Testament. Wrong administration. To/For. No one here is a Judean.

RAF is more succinct than I.

The original was from Oral Roberts, I think. This idea may go back to the early church fathers - Augustine, maybe? Maybe not. I don't know. Someone does. The gospels deliberately linked their narratives and theologies to the OT (and to Virgil and Homer, according to D.R. MacDonald, et.al.) The writers of the epistles did the same. This is obvious, right? Connect it backwards so you can now connect it forward. It's an interpretive framework. It's reading into the text something not conceived by the OT authors and editors. It's a theological perspective. It's academic. Pretty neat way of looking at it. But it doesn't mean God wrote anything. It just means the writers were clever, as was Oral Robert's. I'm not knocking this interpretive perspective. That's just what it looks like to me. Again, it's academic. It's a glove. If it fits, wear it.