Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Nathan_Jr

Members
  • Posts

    2,987
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    66

Everything posted by Nathan_Jr

  1. E.W. Bullinger was a Flat Earther and member of the Universal Zetetic Society. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_flat_Earth_beliefs#19th_and_early_20th_centuries The fallacy of Flat Earth is the glove that fits the four-crucified hand.
  2. The ongoing discussion at large on the linguistics and biology related to gender and sex became abruptly and immediately relevant to me last night when I learned my first cousin is trans. We are the same age and were close as children. I only ever knew him as he/him. That's how will refer to him until he himself tells me otherwise. He was born male but now identifies as female. I found out about this at the same time I found out he has been missing for one year. It was also revealed to me that he was involved in the seditious riot in D.C. on January 6, 2021. No doubt the disparity between his extreme political identification and his gender identification had a role to play in his erratic and mysterious behavior, his divorce, his business loss, and his abandonment of his beloved daughter. I can't imagine the conflict and suffering he experiences within. Surely, one with such radical political ideology wouldn't choose to be trans! I haven't had an opinion on this issue of gender identity. I still don't really know what to think. Still sorting it out. Generally, I just don't care about a person's sexual orientation or identity. It is simply not what matters to me. While looking for some excellent Flat Earth debunking videos from Professor Dave (for the other thread), I found this very, very helpful video explaining sex and gender.
  3. A nice treatment, Chockfull. Thanks. Cone or code? What absurdity! I should know the answer to my own question by now (must renew mind). You aren’t making this up, are you?
  4. What a succinct little presentation — a glove tailor made for Mike’s hand. And Mike readily admits as much. This guy had Mike in mind Though, I might push back a bit on the data silo. The silo from which Mike draws his feed is not filled with data or information, rather, it’s filled with beleeef, bullsh-it, misinformation.
  5. If witnessing PFAL and vpw collaterals bears so much fruit, why be involved with GSC, which Mike claims is of the devil? Why engage with such devilishness? Do imagined future rewards exist for running races against spotters? victor was hyper-focused on devil stuff. The devil seemed to get as much or more of his attention as God, as Love. This is a hallmark of religious fraudsters, because it is so easy to talk about the devil, but really quite difficult to talk about that which is eternal, that which can’t be named - Principle, Love, Truth… God. What is the fruit of witnessing bullshonta?
  6. We’ve veered far off track, but it’s been fruitful. The original post explains the REAL topic. Here it is for the 2nd time. This establishes it. Mike wanted me to start this topic so he can do what he does. What I want is to find out is who the other six "the men of god" are. Johniam said a music coordinator told him victor was "The 7th THE Man of God." Who is this music coordinator and who are the other six "THE Men of God"? I'm happy to discuss determinism and the illusion of free will, as long a we get to the bottom of this T7TMOG thing. This goes to the heart of cult manipulation and cult leadership and what it means to be a cult.
  7. Oh, Irony. I see you. You don’t have to beg for attention, little girl. I know where you are. There, there. It’s ok. I know you’re restless. Let Daddy change out of his work clothes, then we’ll go for a walk. The religious corporation (kingdom) invented by victor paul wierwille, which is based upon his “writings” and “sermons,” is easily the most physically, psychologically, intellectually and spiritually oppressive force I have ever known.
  8. Mike "The truths in PFAL are true no matter how rotten VPW's old man nature was." The countless errors in PFAL are demonstrably erroneous no matter what one beleeeves.
  9. “An ocean of doubt.” I don’t think that metaphor works for anyone here. No one is swimming in an ocean of doubt. The ocean is, perhaps, a better metaphor for Truth. Have you ever swam in the ocean? Ever swam out far enough from the beach that it gets a little spooky? Ever been out far enough on a fishing boat where shore is no longer visible, all alone? What did you find? Or, what found you? Fear? Peace? Awe? Wonder? Humility? Power? Grace? All of the above? None of the above? How immeasurably immense the ocean is! How indescribably immense! If I walk into the surf, scoop some water with my cupped hands, is that the ocean in my hands? Obviously not! Is Truth something to be possessed? Does it fit in a glove?
  10. l You claim there's fruit in your life. Once again you use the abstract (like all that supposed good Saint Vic was supposed to do). How about some specifics? Considering you claim we have piddly replacements, I would assume you have oodles of examples of fruit in your life. Edited 30 minutes ago by So_crates To answer Mike's questions - 1. I don't think anyone expects anything of you. Reason wasn't involved when you fixed your beleeef in victor paul wierwille, reason won't get you out of it. This seems obvious, self-evident. 2. I'm not sure anyone is offering a replacement beleeef. I don't see any evangelizing or proselytizing here. I see a tremendously diverse bunch with at least one thing in common.
  11. How would you know? My daddy owns this bar. I decide what my daddy says. He has cookies. Hold on… I know they are around here somewhere…
  12. How will I know your will, if I can't read your words? Simple math, baby. Take a break. Take a nap. Do it all while standing, of course. That way no one gets missed. See? Fresh salad is always being served. Just a tremendous kernel! Hey, I didn't write the book, so I know how you feel, and I can't do this alone. Some call it parallel. Some call it balanced. I call it a kaiser blade. SIMPLE!
  13. Though that is objectively true, that's not what he's saying. Not REALLY. It's a more nuanced point. It's not about YOU. Not REALLY. That you won't or can't even understand what I'm saying, and that I am even attempting to explain it, well, that's REALLY what it's about. *Here's a a recent TIP for your cookie jar: To/for parallel to the ablative case vertically aligned to the vocative case. BOOM! No one gets missed.
  14. Nothing wrong with setting boundaries. Cults and charlatans like victor paul wierwille do not respect boundaries. Boundaries are important. Sometimes, common ground is nowhere to be found. "Some men you just can't reach." (Thinking of someone else.)
  15. I realized it had already been done. We could beat it up, again. After all, it’s just one of many necrotized infections on that rotting corpse floating in that filthy bathtub.
×
×
  • Create New...