JayDee

Just curious rrobs. Why is that a concern? Keeping score?

I see his ministry in this regard too Twinky. Thanks again for your insight regarding BG.

Very well said Twinky. Your last paragraph in particular, is taken to heart. Thanks!

And none of this has anything to do with salvation. They’re “non-issues”. Whenever we come “face to face” with Jesus Christ, he’s not going to ask “ Did you believe in the Trinity, 4 crucified, are the dead alive now, dispensations, the bema, etc.” He’s gonna ask if we love him. Just as he did with Peter. Every knee will bow, whether a Trinitarian or not. In my experience most people don’t have even a little bit of understanding about the Trinity. Why it even came into existence. And it had nothing to do with “debil spurts” or “doctrines of debils”. More twi nonsense. Scholars, real scholars have taught for centuries Trinitarian doctrine. The vast majority of Christianity believe in Trinity. Are they ALL wrong? Only the narrow minded view of twi and other similar organizations have a problem with it and that’s the main reason in my view that vp pushed it so hard and why so many of his followers accepted his poorly researched and written JCING. Arrogant, egotistical, division of the body of Christ. I for one refuse to debate the subject. I can’t say it more emphatically...IT DOESN’T MATTER. As to Billy Graham’s ministry, like anyone else’s, I ask “where’s the fruit”? Countless thousands came to Jesus Christ. Jesus saves. Not Billy Graham or vp or any other minister. Call BG names, disparage him in any way. He’ll say “Yes” when Jesus asks “Do you love me”? By the way...I’m not a Trinitarian. And again, I’m not debating.

At the name of Jesus, every knee shall bow.

Cool.

Doesn’t matter to me. What’s the title if you don’t mind?

Sorry. My misinterpretation. I thought GoldStar had written a book. I have Penworks book.

If you don’t mind me asking GoldStar, what book?

If you go looking for a fight you will surely find one.

Welcome GoldStar

The kindness I was shown. It was genuine.

Sorry for the triple post mods. Don’t know what I did wrong and don’t know how to delete 2 of them. Help?

Of course you do. Your hero did too. It brought HIM the attention. Just like you so desperately crave. Sell your brand of snake oil to someone else will ya’?

I wonder how you can separate the man from his faulty logic and his deliberate mishandling of scripture? Let alone leaving Jesus Christ out of the picture as “absent”. Come on man!

Wow.

I don’t call it “Brave” defending an unconvicted serial rapist. And yes, I am a veteran. But that’s not what helps me recognize you as a coward. Your words in defense of veepee, and continuing to dodge answering direct questions do that pretty well. Why are you so afraid to admit you’re wrong?

Now, if you’d be as detailed in your response to Twinky and others who’ve confronted you with legitimate questions... Cherrypicker And yes, I have confronted “real bad guys in person”. That’s why I don’t have any problem whatsoever calling you out. Keep typing in red

You stopped writing about it, but you haven't stopped believing it. The despicable human being who's been your hero for decades continues to cloud your judgement. Time after time you've been asked direct questions only to give vague responses. You're a coward Mike. Cowards are at the mercy of their fear. Your fear is that you've been wrong about veepee your entire adult life. You can't admit you're wrong. I accepted your apology several days ago. Now I'm apologizing for having done so. People have bent over backwards here to help you see the error of your ways. You've rejected them all. How can they all be wrong and you're the only one that's right? Ever ask yourself that question? Probably not. And I know you'll cherry pick your resonse to me (if you do at all). And that's ok. I get it. Cause you're a coward.

Forgive who for what?

What’s your thoughts on the context of John 10:10 waysider? It’s a subject I’ve been looking at for quite a while now. And I agree with you about that verse being lifted out of context and a doctrine built on it. Thanks for your insights.

Apology accepted Mike.