Rocky

Joshua Eugene Harris is an American author and former pastor. Harris' 1997 book I Kissed Dating Goodbye, in which he laid out his ideas concerning a Biblically-based Christian approach to dating and relationships, helped shape purity culture for many Christian millennials.[1] Harris was lead pastor of Covenant Life Church, the founding church of Sovereign Grace Ministries, in Gaithersburg, Maryland from 2004 until 2015. In 2018, Harris disavowed I Kissed Dating Goodbye and discontinued its publication. The following year, Harris announced that he was separating from his wife, had "undergone a massive shift in regard to my faith in Jesus" and was not a Christian.

This TED Talk is applicable to LOTS of what we've been through as former wayfers... including covid19 and the vaccines, however indirectly.

As if there's any other way to read the article? Btw, since when are YOU in Japan?

I take what the Guardian says as well documented and lacking bias as much as possible. My (first) cousin (once removed) is a covid ICU nurse in Rochester, NY. She has been saying the same thing for months.

Pretty succinct way to summarize the situation.

All American adults now approved for the BOOSTER.

This is definitely for you Allan.

Thank you for being compassionate in the face of all of that.

I've had that kind of test three times in the last year and a half. Negative every time. Congrats.

I would also hope somewhere out there in cyberspace someone is compiling DATA (FACTS) on that very idea. I have to figure someone probably is doing so.

Yikes!

Intriguing data that would be good to know. Alas, dear Allan eschews data/facts.

You are factually incorrect. The graphIC (it wasn't a graph) was a complete statement of fact. Your narrative from the beginning of this thread has been wrong, even if some details may have been right. You OPPOSED and DEFIED rationality, logic and FACT.* IF you had any reasonable level of communication skill, you would have been able to look in the mirror, or inside yourself, to realize that it's okay to have questions about the interpretation of FACTS and formulated a narrative to incorporate those questions to actually add to discussion in this thread. *Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), is a pattern of negativistic, defiant, disobedient and hostile behaviour, and is one of the most prevalent disorders from preschool age to adulthood. ODD is marked by defiant and disobedient behavior towards authority figures. ** I am NOT a medical professional and am not attempting any kind of diagnosis of anyone. However, your consistently inappropriate interaction on this thread has not added to any kind of uplifted group understanding of the issue at hand. I am describing the interaction as potentially mimicking ODD.

Do you know anyone with ODD? Oppositional defiant disorder?

And I simply redirected your pointless ramblings such that if you have QUESTIONS about the facts presented, IF you have even one iota of intellectual honesty or curiosity, you would/could pursue answers to said questions. Nothing more, nothing less. The graphIC presents DATA. DATA = FACT. If more FACTS are necessary to address your questions, I showed you where to direct those questions.

I address this to whoever reads this. Obviously, the graphIC shows ONE point in time. The things the Aussie claims the graphIC tells him are NOT facts. They are his false assumptions. IF he had even one iota of intellectual honesty or curiosity, he WOULD articulate his assumptions rather as questions and then seek out the answers to those questions. The graph presents FACTS. The Aussie claims things that are neither specified, articulated, nor implied by the FACTS presented in the graphIC. If anyone wants to find more facts or information to answer questions the reader may reasonably formulate based on the FACTS presented in the graphIC, I provided links to the healthcare facility so that any such questions can be directed to those at said facility who may provide additional insight.

And yet, you've "wasted" days and days arguing into the abyss onto this thread where nearly everyone is able to recognize there is ZERO substance to your arguments. Will you ever get that time back?

Cheyenne, Wyoming DATA = FACTS Recent Public health DATA from Cheyenne in the graphic in my post above.

By what authority do you demand anyone respond to your inane, misleading questions?

Then again, Allan discounts data as non-factual and biased.

2016? HA! In data science, five year old narratives are archaic and anachronistic. Nevertheless, you disavowed reliance on data for credible decision-making. You added a dismissive emoji as if you had proven anything? Sure, Poindexter.

How can you critically assess what's fact and what's disinformation? Hint: since you disavow DATA, you can't.

Admitting that he doesn't accept DATA from institutions responsible for dealing with the problem is essentially the same as boldly proclaiming that he embraces nothing but cockamamie conspiracy theories. DATA = FACTS.

Do you think this is surprising to any of us?