Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Rocky

Members
  • Posts

    14,686
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    197

Everything posted by Rocky

  1. Then again, perhaps someday YOU will understand there's NFW you're going to get through Mike's impenetrable confirmation bias. IF you want to address the imagined lurkers, you might consider a different strategy than just being tossed about with every wind of Mike's bull shonta.
  2. I think he stopped. He asked to be removed from GSC membership. I'm not sure, but the mods may have honored his request. Nevertheless, I just found this YouTube clip.
  3. Why Mike doesn't respond to facts, logic, or rational arguments.
  4. of course. I have plenty of choices. Must limit sodium intake, however.
  5. I still use granulated kelp as a salt substitute. If anyone wants to know of a good source, Maine Coast Sea Vegetables https://seaveg.com/ Amazon and Walmart.com also sell smaller packages of the Maine Coast products.
  6. Do I need to post another YouTube video of Professor Irwin Corey here? Do you have any idea how freakin' outrageous it is to continue engaging with him at all? If you want to address something to the great unwashed masses (or even if they wash regularly and just get an inkling to question the "greatness" of a certain cult), why not synthesize and summarize the essence of his arguments and claims in a succinct document and get it posted to GSC and ask the mods to make it not subject to inane ramblings? IOW, develop a document, post it or get it posted and not have it be subject to discussion... at least on the post or new thread on which it's initially posted. For ANYONE to continue to pose the kind of question (even if not in the form of a question) you posed in what I quoted herein, is tantamount to continuing to do the same thing repeatedly and expect a different outcome. Don't continue to criticize him. Criticize his bottom-line ideas.
  7. The imaginary or imagined viewing audience? Oh, and btw, on the subject of no one can go farther than they are led... The ONE who follows the CULT LEADER... And then there's what the late Gail Sheehy wrote in her excellent book on leadership, Pathfinders...
  8. At what point do those who engage with the world's foremost authority recognize they are wasting their time and energy thinking they're doing anything other than spinning their wheels or tilting at windmills? Selah.
  9. Of course, the videos of Professor Irwin Corey were facetious. But THIS is NOT. That Mike self-aggrandizes counters any and all credibility he might think he has.
  10. Mike is the world's foremost authority, successor to Professor Irwin Corey. Corey lived to be more than 100 years old.
  11. Btw, I did an internet search for "Darwinian construct." The results were clear as mud. https://duckduckgo.com/?hps=1&q=darwinian+construct&atb=v353-1&ia=web
  12. But Mike's the world's foremost authority, succeeding Professor Irwin Corey.
  13. Really? SMH. I can't believe ANYONE who still follows TWI and wierwilleism reads Mike's gibberish (in English). And if they do, I can't believe they do anything but shake their own heads over the mental masturbation taking place on threads like this.
  14. Did you mean to say YOUR INTENTION was to calm the discussion down somewhat? Your intention appears not to have translated into a message which could accomplish such an objective. Do you REALLY think how you were actually viewing your statements matters at all to anyone? Not just here, but anywhere? Let me see, I'll try it for you, see if this makes any sense to you, Honestly Mike, WTF? More than two decades of doing the same thing and you expect different results?
  15. Unless you had removed yourself already. For me, the removal was in 1986, 37 years ago. I started THAT journey in the early 1990s. My employer incentivized taking the bus to work. I started reading and exploring during said commutes by bus. I'm quite thankful. Similar to the firehose of falsehoods. Because how can someone encountering such a firehose cope well enough to figure out what's truth or consistent? Propaganda is communication that is primarily used to influence or persuade an audience to further an agenda, which may not be objective and may be selectively presenting facts to encourage a particular synthesis or perception, or using loaded language to produce an emotional rather than a rational response to the information that is being presented.[1] Propaganda can be found in a wide variety of different contexts.[2] IOW, we were inundated with propaganda and had no chance, in the moment, to sort it out or critically analyze any of it.
  16. An insightful reflection indeed. To me, it's clear this particular cult is locked into a social framework based on fear of having its cash-flow severely diminished. When its followers break the chains in their minds... well, I envision stories (fiction) to provide encouragement to break those chains.
×
×
  • Create New...