-
Posts
14,687 -
Joined
-
Days Won
197
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by Rocky
-
JT was implying that Clinton is a Rhodes Scholar, not Martindale. And Steve!, I think Clinton probably is a Rhodes Scholar. :D--> You talkin to me?
-
Point of fact: PJ changed his post AFTER Rafael's first response post. I didn't make a copy of the first draft, but I did read it before it was changed. Also, while I understand Catcup's anger, I believe Oakspear's insight answers it most appropriately. Rafael's response was very reasonable. :D--> You talkin to me?
-
:D--> You talkin to me?
-
niKa, JesusFreaky told me the other day he is no longer in TWI and he lives in Gatlinberg (sp?) TN. I have a framed print of a pencil drawing of eagles that he did many moons ago. That print is the inspiration for the tattoo I plan to get soon... :D--> You talkin to me?
-
nolongerlurking 3/17 happy birthday!
Rocky replied to Kit Sober's topic in Birthdays and Anniversaries
You're still younger than me. :D--> You talkin to me? -
Happy Birthday OnionEater, 3/16. Hope it's keen!
Rocky replied to Kit Sober's topic in Birthdays and Anniversaries
:D--> You talkin to me? -
Happy Birthday OnionEater, 3/16. Hope it's keen!
Rocky replied to Kit Sober's topic in Birthdays and Anniversaries
:D--> You talkin to me? -
nolongerlurking 3/17 happy birthday!
Rocky replied to Kit Sober's topic in Birthdays and Anniversaries
:D--> You talkin to me? -
Actually, I figured it would dock at Charlotte. That's where I remember touring the occasional navy ship that would come in for promotional reasons when I was a kid. Btw, I really loved Durand Eastman Park in the spring/summer. :D--> You talkin to me?
-
The Breeze... so, does it come in right next to Sea Breeze? Or is that amusement park still around? :D--> You talkin to me?
-
:D--> You talkin to me? [This message was edited by Rocky on March 15, 2004 at 13:23.]
-
I don't know if anyone else is prohibited from there... but I am... and would rather not start rehashing (again) how that came to be. :D--> You talkin to me?
-
Why's that Radar? To limit who is allowed to participate? :D--> You talkin to me?
-
A Conservative Surprise Re: Gay Marriage
Rocky replied to Juan Cruz's topic in The Birds and the Bees
se-man-tics ( P ) Pronunciation Key (s-mntks) n. (used with a sing. or pl. verb) 1 Linguistics. The study or science of meaning in language. 2 Linguistics. The study of relationships between signs and symbols and what they represent. Also called semasiology. 3 The meaning or the interpretation of a word, sentence, or other language form: We're basically agreed; let's not quibble over semantics. Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. :D--> You talkin to me? -
A Conservative Surprise Re: Gay Marriage
Rocky replied to Juan Cruz's topic in The Birds and the Bees
Well, LG, you seem to be taking issue more with which word to use than the underlying issues. And that IS semantics. bottom line is that I could care less what you believe. I'm not even taking exception to your views. I simply disagree. And yet, as I read your position on this issue, you seem to be willing to address the human/civil rights issues, but you seem very certain about what you want the solution called, and what you do not want it called. That IS semantics, from where I sit. :D--> You talkin to me? -
A Conservative Surprise Re: Gay Marriage
Rocky replied to Juan Cruz's topic in The Birds and the Bees
zixar, I was not talking to you. Stop stalking me. -
A Conservative Surprise Re: Gay Marriage
Rocky replied to Juan Cruz's topic in The Birds and the Bees
It appears to me that Catcup was NOT being hostile to any individual, nor was she calling names or doing anything but putting forth ideas that should be considered as our culture and society faces the need to change and to accommodate the human rights of individuals who deserve to be treated with dignity and respect. Perhaps with Long Gone, it is a simple matter of semantics, regarding definitions for marriage vs civil union. I've seen LG speak for the rights of individuals, but the adamant stand that "marriage" not be redefined seems to be something that decision makers who were intent (on both sides, govt and gays; not gays vs hatemongers) on resolving issues would eventually compromise on given that there is basic agreement on the UNDERLYING issue of human rights. Certain other arguments taking on Catcup appear to be, as alluded to by Catcup, nitpiking and therefore, IMO evasive and not engaging the real issues. And I am not referring to Steve expounding on gender pay comparisons, which, to me do not seem relevant to this issue. :D--> You talkin to me? -
I have to go with Ex10 on this. It's still about The Way. The doctrine was critical to the practice. Without the teachings, the practices would have been much easier to realize as nonsense. If someone doesn't want to engage Mike in that dialogue, don't. But for the primary mission -- making clear the error of The Way -- it's not at all unreasonable to engage in discussion of the errors in both the teaching and the practice in the same forum. :D--> You talkin to me?
-
Hey niKa niKa -- I don't know the words to that song, but I read your "postalness". More like "righteous indignation" if you ask me. I'm sure glad to STILL know you folks... niKa, and Excie, and Simon, and everbody else!!! :D--> You talkin to me?
-
A Conservative Surprise Re: Gay Marriage
Rocky replied to Juan Cruz's topic in The Birds and the Bees
And the surviving "mother" is not guaranteed to get custody of the children... :D--> You talkin to me? -
You CAN'T be talkin to ME? :D--> You talkin to me?
-
All hail the power of Excathedra's name!! :D--> You talkin to me?
-
A Conservative Surprise Re: Gay Marriage
Rocky replied to Juan Cruz's topic in The Birds and the Bees
whatever --> you are obviously RIGHT on any issue on which you take a position. :D--> You talkin to me? -
A Conservative Surprise Re: Gay Marriage
Rocky replied to Juan Cruz's topic in The Birds and the Bees
BUT... the unmarried heterosexual couple had the OPTION, and therefore the RIGHT to marry and make such a scenario a non-issue. Thus far, the same-sex couple does NOT have the option, and therefore, I agree, it is a CIVIL rights issue. :D--> You talkin to me?