Rocky

That's what I figured.

Great pics... I swam in Lake Ontario on numerous occasions in my childhood (lived in Rochester NY) and have been to the shores of Lakes Erie and Michigan... I'd love to check out Lakes Superior and Huron... Where are the pics with Abi in them?

Good luck with that. I'm thinking that a complete boycott (by you, or any one American consumer) may not be easily accomplished. If it's possible at all, it would come with huge cost, I would guess. If you find ways to do so that can be passed on to others, please let us know. I'm sure there's plenty of us who would like to join you.

It's been work to stay cool these days.... otherwise everything's peachy.

I just read that Dbacks' outfielder Eric Byrnes, who hails from the San Fran bay area, and barely missed having LaRussa pick him for the NL all star squad, will be there anyway. But NOT in the stadium. Byrnes and his pet bulldog will be reporting from McCovey Cove from a kayak. That should be pretty interesting. Might make the game worth watching.... :)

btw, last fall, I got stopped in the 'burb where I live, because my tail light was broken. The cop thought he had a right to harass me. He didn't. He refused to allow me to get out of my car to show him what the deal was. The fact was, he claimed that the light, which was supposed to shine in red, was missing the cover, it WOULD BE, when lit, white. He was wrong. White represents a car coming toward you, if you see it in front of you. So, it would confuse and possibly cause a collision. The only problem... the one that was supposed to shine red DID so. Only the parking (or back up light) shined white. He didn't give me a ticket. I challenged both the rookie that was practicing on me and his veteran police officer partner who told him to practice on me. I followed up by calling the mayor/city council/city manager offices to register my concern. Even though the Phoenix area is geographically quite large, Scottsdale isn't. I've been followed by these bozos since then but nobody dares stop me. Of course, if I were to commit a ticketable offense, I would expect to get stopped. But I'm nobody's practice... :) My point is... even though cops do things, they aren't always right in doing so... and they CAN be challenged and put in their places. But it helps to understand what they can and cannot rightfully/lawfully do.

Excie, I understand your concern. But WE here at GSC probably do not know what the law is where you are. My point is that as unfair and unreasonable as it feels, and it always does in a situation like that, in general, cops are allowed to lie. But to know what your rights and your son's rights are, you should ask someone with knowledge of your state/local laws (but not the cops themselves, because they will probably lie to you... and I'm NOT being sarcastic in saying that).

there's nothing in federal law, necessarily, covering the conduct of police officers lying to trick perps and potential witnesses/informants into divulging what information they might have. The ONLY federal law that would have anything to do with this would be related to Civil Rights. However, state laws vary. What's true in NY or NJ might be different in ME or CA. In practice, cops are notorious liars... the end justifies the means, ya know! If I were you Excie, I'd check with lawyer or the local bar association where you live to find out what you can or can't expect from cops in a situation like this.

Actually, the NEWS related to this issue today is the connection between chronic stress and weight gain for people eating high fat/high carb (junk) foods. I believe, intuitively, that this link exists. I believe that was my problem. I did not have proper eating habits AND I was subject to serious levels of chronic stress. THIS new understanding is NOT a panacea. Nor is anyone who is seriously investigating weight management issues (personally or professionally, possibly excluding marketing hucksters) necessarily viewing it as a panacea. This new information gives hope to millions of people (or will do so when they realize what this means to them) who have tried diets and after years of failure to get a handle on it. Again, over the last 2.5 years, I've lost more than 85 pounds. The "secret" for me has been better understanding of nutrition options, ways to drastically reduce the level of chronic stress in my life AND an aggressive, regular exercise regimen. Indeed, it's really NO secret. But for the millions who have not been able to figure it out, it certainly seems like someone has been keeping it secret. AND -- there is good reason that at this time that drugs approved by the FDA for use in a weight loss program are limited (one for sure, maybe two... but not this thing). And the fat blocking drug, orlistat, which has been available by Rx, but now in smaller doses over-the-counter, WORKS for people who need a boost when reaching a plateau in a long-term program consisting of better eating habits and exercise.

I agree... but let's not forget the Biography channel.

88 percent. B+ 23 of 26 correct. Could be because I enjoy (and regularly watch) the Science Channel, DiscoveryHDTheatre, NationalGeographic Channel, and the Equator Channel (which is a part of the VOOM network which now belongs to Dish Network).

Not to be a curmudgeon here, but quality of life is directly related to politics. I went to see a movie this afternoon. I now understand why Dot asked the question (at the start of this thread). It occurs to me that quality of life in any given country, region or community is a measure of the politics, and its effectiveness in representing the will of the people of that particular geographic entity. If I didn't have such an aversion to cold weather, I'd be very interested in checking out Canada and it's culture, environment and such. But then again, I'm in a select group of Americans. Not only do I have medical coverage, I have the coverage in a NOT-FOR-PROFIT government administered single payer system. That's something all Americans should DEMAND... and which Canadians, Brits, Frenchmen/women and those in Cuba (among others in the world) already have.

Hey Dot, You certainly are entitled to your feelings... and it's understandable to consider change of venue when other things in your life are also changing... I wish you quick, relatively peaceful resolution to all of the uncertainties and variables you're facing these days. Canada sounds like a great place to live... but I'm not sure I'd be at all comfortable with so much more cold weather (than I get here in central AZ). I don't know the population profile for Canada, but it seems like they have more open (far less densely populated) space than in most of the US.

Hey niKa, Long time no see... glad to hear you've been having a good time with your family in the great outdoors! So, that leg must be doing quite well, from the sound of your enthusiasm... which is great news. Oh and I hope we hear from Tom Strange soon, I understand it's been even wetter in Texas than in OK.

And then there's the Dbacks. No team in the NL has more wins than the Dbacks. Yet, sometimes this team, with a decent pitching staff, a couple of seasoned veterans and a whole bunch of youngsters (rookies or not much more experience than that), plays some really awful baseball. Several times, the Dbacks have committed several errors in a game, giving the opponent what ends up being a fairly easy win... including the two games I (we) have attended. Frustrating....

Good luck, brother... and best wishes. You're going to need both. I hope you two get comfortable living with each other before you start reproducing humans. ;)

Soooooooooooo.............. COME ON DOWN! The Price is Right!

THIS brings up an interesting point. In the USA, exercising one's freedom of speech is NOT without consequences. That's correct. People who make outrageous statements -- whether it's a teenager just trying to get attention or challenge authority, or someone who seriously believes some generally accepted belief, idea or notion needs to be challenged (for example, by organized protest, or letters to editors, etc.) -- SUFFER CONSEQUENCES for doing so. In most cases, however, those consequences revolve around social pressures rather than state sanctioned legal problems. Personally, I think the expression "political correctness" is OVERused as an excuse to ridicule things people say that we see are absurd or otherwise outrageous.

I smoked weed a sum total of ONE time in my life. Got stoned pretty easily. I actually drove my car while stoned. For the life of me, I can't see any (physical) reason I didn't get in a horrific collision while driving under the influence. I laughed an awful lot. But I detested the awareness that I was not as in control of my actions as I usually am... and that was plenty of motivation for me to not do it again. I also REALLY detest the idea of putting any kind of smoke in my lungs... I have enough trouble with allergies as it is... So, that puts me sorta into one or more of the categories Groucho and/or Excie listed. But I would have (and therefore did) phrase it differently. I probably would not be happy with it if I knew my daughter was a marijuana user. Perhaps for those who enjoy it... as long as they are able to properly function in jobs/vocations/social relationships (i.e. be successfully handling all relevant responsibilities), I likely wouldn't care whether a person used it regularly or from time to time. My daughter is not at a place in her life (given her age, 17) where she could either financially afford it or reasonably sacrifice time she should be focused on school and other productive pursuits.

OR... to put this very point in different words... WHEN HELL FREEZES OVER.

When I took Sociology 101 back in college, one of the things that made a lasting impression on me was on the topic of what it takes for people at various ages/stages of development to make genuine changes in their deeply held values/convictions. For young children, parents make a huge difference, to different degrees at different ages. But for adults (I know, whether PH is one of those is still an open question), it takes a "significant emotional event." Which is why it's so difficult to rehabilitate criminals sometimes. As bizarre as we all probably realize this whole media frenzy has been (over PH going to jail), it seems pretty clear that for her, this actually WAS a significant emotional event. Which is why it has also appeared that she has indeed undergone a genuine change of heart. Notice I said "appeared." The possibility still exists that this whole thing has been a put on by her... but I suspect the judge actually got through to her. Which, if it did occur, would be a very good thing.

And more than likely, so will I! :)

Somebody caught some of the stRangers STREAKING!!?? I'm shocked!

Last I knew, he was working for the San Jose Mercury News. Don't know if that's still the case, but I wouldn't be surprised if it is.

Yeah, Gracies okay. Just as laid back and conversational doing games as he would be in person, or in interviews. Can't even come close to comparing him with Mr. Scully, of course. Gracie and Daren Sutton banter back and forth, quite playfully... they do well together. Sutton replaced Thom Brenneman, who left to work with his father in Cincinatti. Brenneman was good and I thought I'd miss him but I don't. Sutton is a mellow guy... as one might expect, he played some baseball (pitcher of course) but never made it past the minor leagues. Both Grace and Sutton are guys you would feel comfortable sitting down and having a beer with. And yes, I did notice that Vin was alone in the booth. I just can't imagine what LA area baseball fans will go through when he's actually done, one way or the other. No doubt there will be plenty of grieving. btw, I LOVE your avatar! Who do you think you are, George BUSH?! ;)