Rocky

However, the problem-filled lives of teenagers trying to figure out how to become integrated into society IS a necessary burden for both sides to solve somehow. ln today's version of Western Civilization, doesn't religion (Christianity) present (obviously imperfect) ways to cope with those problems? I remember being thankful for my nieces and nephews having a structure to guide them along that path. Now it's a set of problems my daughter and grandchildren are navigating... IMO very complicated and not so easy. Just my limited point of view.

Is anyone likely to sue them for using it? Btw, it sounded more like Good Seed to me. I'm an old guy, I could be wrong.

Thanks Nathan for posting that YT vid. I feel sorry for the people who committed a year (or however much time) to this latest iteration of the way ambassador outreach program. Old wine skins, as the bible says.

It's not so much cringe worthy as an attempt to invoke nostalgia by way of using VERY OLD way music.

I'm not getting the connection to ROA 2025. Please at least give a clue or two.

Fair question. It goes to the heart (or core) of what we understand, and unquestioningly accept as the essence of Christianity. It may have been more apparent centuries ago that humankind (and humans individually) needed saving from the fallen nature of the "old man." There are so many more people on Earth now as a result of advances in agriculture and science, that it may not seem as universally true these days. Then again, maybe people will post cogent arguments to answer your question here soon.

This is essentially why Proverbs 2:1-5 is my favorite scripture passage. Btw, it just now occurred to me that those who stopped being active on GSC over the last year or two, when they complained about people disagreeing with them about the bible, may really boil down to, for them, a lack of that hunger for spiritual insight... I can't say I know that I know that I know such a thing. Because I can't tell what's really going on in their heart of hearts. But it seems plausible.

I hope you don't get too disappointed if she never responds to your inquiry. I figure many (most?) people never consider the question at all. I only do because I embrace (rather than shy away from) uncomfortable questions, with curiosity.

I have no problem with you using the word "fact" in your post/comment. Further, I now believe "inspired by God" has a much broader meaning than what Victor Wierwille taught us. I believe something (one says or writes) CAN be "inspired" by God even though it's not necessarily directly given by God (whomever (or whatever form) she or he may actually be) verbatim. But that's an entirely different discussion. Nevertheless, I take no issue with your post/comment and appreciate the thought you put into it.

I'm not going to fact check the number in your claim, but I acknowledge your overall point. I listened to a discussion between Steven Pinker (cognitive scientist) and an interviewer with the Free Press. The interview is NOT politics. Though the clip is about 44 minutes long, I got the main takeaway very early on in the interview. Essentially, for thousands of years, facts eluded most people. Therefore, people evolved to learn from and believe STORIES. Stories that made the most sense to the people hearing them at the time. For those thousands of years, one of the main objectives of humans (who lived and traveled in TRIBES) revolved around survival. Facts did not always provide protection for the tribes. Today we have databases and research that rapidly contribute to the amount of truthful and factual knowledge. However, people STILL are inclined to learn from and believe their favored stories that contribute to their tribe's wellbeing. Religion is one of those areas of knowledge that is evolving rapidly. Victor Wierwille, even if he had been an honest seeker of the truth of God's Word, did not seem to contribute to any database or factual knowledge that humanity in general has been able to benefit from. If you'd like to check it out, here it is.

Well... other than the "I'm right and they're wrong" aspect of your post I figure there could be some reasonable insight to looking at Jesus as fulfillment of OT law. I totally reject the paradigm of black/white, wrong/right interpretations of scripture. WE (humans/humanity) IMO are far too limited to be able to clearly define (most) interpretations of scripture as such. Stay curious and be willing to consider new ways to look at them. Just sayin'.

This showed up in my YouTube feed this morning.

Of course it makes sense. EVERY human is highly qualified to rationalize and therefore justify what they believe about anything, including what they consider God. Same goes for EVERY religion. There is no religion that can rightly claim their God (or god or gods) is/are the only true God and that they can prove it. It's all about taking it on faith. IOW, every religion has an origin story and a narrative about what they believe is THE truth.

Even IF it's "belief that since God can do no wrong, it is always wrong of the person if they leave the faith..." that's just how a person's very human rationalization for their criticism is simply a manifestation of the human tendency to criticize something they disagree with.

I certainly don't speak for anyone who criticizes anyone like you. But I do suspect the culprit may be human nature which finds ways and reasons to justify criticizing anyone with whom they disagree. I'd recommend, to the extent possible, you just let go of your irritation (or whatever you experience) when recognizing such criticism of you and your path. We ALL get criticized. Sometimes justly, other times not.

Yeah, I get it. However, you became the you that you are because of the decision that you made. IOW, I look at the fact that I didn't graduate from college until I was 31 differently, though my detours were both US military service and TWI. I lived some life and gained some insight I wouldn't have been able to if not for the experiences, good and bad, I had as a young adult. Ultimately, I expect to reach my 70th birthday this year. I'm a survivor. My first introduction to twi was in October 1974.

I hope you eventually did go to college.

IMO, not only did decision makers at HQ not "get revelation" for making good decisions, they apparently also lacked good business sense as well as sound foresight. Especially concerning disruptive technological innovation and the accelerating nature thereof. Just sayin'.

One might reasonably surmise that to be the reason he said it.

Already obsolete?

Not to mention that Wierwille, though clearly also highly paranoid like Jones, didn't incite a mass murder/suicide event.

Three episodes. Link to watch on Hulu. Subscription required. Also, I started reading a former People's Temple member's book, Seductive Poison by Deborah Layton, published 1998. Many parallels btwn Jones' cult and TWI.

Sounds political...

and shellfish? Leviticus 11:9-11 New International Version 9 “‘Of all the creatures living in the water of the seas and the streams you may eat any that have fins and scales. 10 But all creatures in the seas or streams that do not have fins and scales—whether among all the swarming things or among all the other living creatures in the water—you are to regard as unclean. 11 And since you are to regard them as unclean, you must not eat their meat; you must regard their carcasses as unclean.

A man sees/hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest...