I am wondering how someone who is obviously intellegent can heap praise on a person (wierwille), who has been shown to have plagerized
most of his work as well as been allegedly dievient in part of his life !
I don't understand this at all ?
Someone needs to explain this to me !
Tony
From "Paul?s Foundational Class" by Jon Nessle (aka Research Geek):
"Now some might say that this entire study is superfluous in light of the fact that we are all familiar with and have all partaken of a wonderful example of a foundational class: the Power for Abundant Living class taught by our Father in the Word, Dr. Victor Paul Wierwille. But I, as my manner is, like to go back to the primary evidence and re-inspect it and now I can better understand and appreciate that great example.
Perhaps we allowed Doctor's original class to be too easily dismissed in favor of the promise of something new but untested. Its replacement despite the yes-men's accolades did not turn out to be the quality of the former. And that, perhaps was, in part, a reason why we lost access to it and now have to build one anew. I pray that when we are done rebuilding our foundation, we'll have something to shout about as the builders of the second temple's foundation did in Ezra!"
Long Live Israel !