So_crates

It's simple: we don't steal others works and claim them as our own and we keep our paws off of the ministry women, reserving our passions for our wife.

So, the artful dodger wants to critique others on dodging. Are you saying dodging is wrong? Does this mean you'll stop dodging and get down to brass tacks? So, you claim to agape us. Does that mean you love our words and our will?

Another point where Saint Vic excelled. I'm sure he really cared about Mrs. Weirwille's words and her will for her family.

You see the problem here? It's YOU deciding which of Saint Vic's words are trustworthy. Just as it's YOU deciding which of the collaterals we should believe. That's like me telling you which passages in The Secret you should follow.

So you claim to have the truth, yet you refuse to tell us how you arrived at it. Are your methods so flimsy that you're afraid they won't survive scrutiny? Then you only think you have the truth. Can you poke holes in the law of gravity? The law of aerodynamics? How about the Higgs-Boson particle? They're all true and the people that discover them were no afraid of holes being poked in their methodology. As a grad student, don't you have to defend a thesis? It's how truth is arrived at.

Your hubris is showing. So this is what you use to convince yourself your better than anyone else here? That's because is. As it's impossible for any one person to know everything in the universe, so it is impossible to know the whole truth. At best we get just a very, very small piece.

And who decides what is the right way of deciding and what is the wrong way of deciding?

Most of what Saint Vic wanted to say lead to control

He probably meant parallel.

You guessed 'er, chester.

Or language can be fed steroids by cults with a hidden agenda for great evil. And Nate was probably talking about cults with a hidden agenda. So you were wrong for giving him guff. You need to stop trying to make reality fit your theories and look objectively at reality and make your theories fit reality.

I believe it was when the person was told to go to Saul in Acts. Saint Vic said that's how you know it's from God, it's complete unlike psychic who give incomplete information. I thought you studied PLAF for 20 years. And you don't remember that?

So. If the past has no authority over how we use words in the future, why go back to ancient Greek? You've shown your weakness and defective understanding of the whole ball game. To get a clue, read 1984.

First off, Saint Vic said in PLAF when God gives revelation it's complete. So, if God told him there was a manuscript I would think, to make the revelation complete, he would also tell him where to find it. Second. I would think if God had anything to say to Saint Vic he would say, "What are you doing to my daughters?"

Muscles and nerves have nothing to do with free will, the brain does, as it's were decisions are made. A babies brain thinks things like, "Am I hungary?" then I'll cry, "Am I happy?" then I'll coo. Scientist will tell babies watch for the response of the mother so they can begin to persuade her, an act of free will. Adult have had plenty of time to exorcise their free will. What do you think that toddler's no is? What do you think that teenager's rebellion is? Both are acts of them exerting free will. What your seeing is the result of too much choice. Science has proven the more choice you have the unhappier you are.

Free will exists in babies, as they can choose their course of action from coming out of the womb. They just don't exercise their free will. Babies have free will, as they can choose to feed or not, cy or coo. About the terrible twos, about the time the child learns to say no, free will sharply increases. Then there's another sharp increase when the child heads into the rebellious teen years.

YES! YES! YES! We still have the ability to choose whether or not to bend with the influence, hence we still have free will. As Cuddy shows us the postures and body languages that influence our life, we can move from happenstance (pun intended) to being in control of our posture and body language through our free will, and thereby change our life. Awareness + Choice = Free Will @Mike

Many things influence us, including ourselves

So, it's a spiritual competition. Well, you've shown times the home team has shown up late. Shouldn't they have forfeited?

Too funny. It's like if I tried to explain tree surgery using checkers moves and when you told me you were confused, I blamed you for the confusion. Everybody, repeat after me, the communicator is responsible for their communication. It's not my responsibility to guess what you mean. Thank you.

Book of Saint Vic 19:42

So you say. That's why others, in this very thread, have complained about the terminology, right?

You didn't answer the question, just repeted yourself. A dead give away for you not knowing what you're talking about.

Your not making a whole lot of sense. Angels are separate sentient beings and not a part of anyone's balance sheet That would be like saying we're a part of God's budget.

So? Saint Vic claimed he was getting revelation from God when he was actually repeating what he heard from a conspiracy phone in site (the then version of QAnon). Shall we say Saint Vic was an "impractical egghead"? I guess then the yolk would be on him.