Bolshevik

Seems Legit

That number would certainly put my mind at ease. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2785530 https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/covid-19-why-we-cant-use-antibody-tests-show-vaccines-are-working

Right now all I understand is he's talking about the quantitative antibody test (versus a qualitative result) . . . I just counted the pens and markers on my desk . . . and in my drawer . . . I have numbers . . . so what?

Yes . . . Mandalorian . . . Disney . . . Ironman . . Iron Triangle . . . it all comes back to circular reasoning

Help me out here . . . what is the point? How are you comparing test results?

the antibody test was free and let my employer know I could go back to work the PCR test cost $$$$ and let governments know I could leave the continent. The T-decect test . . . is this just data collection at this time?

You're asking for data which is fair enough. What are the collection methods or will the limits be noted? Is there a hypothesis? Are you making a prediction? Would you state it? How will the data support or falsify your prediction?

Post out loud I did. Filter, I did not.

My midichlorian count is usually higher on the weekends.

You said Marxist so I hear dialectic

I don't know of a place it is a good thing. The story isn't true as pointed out. This where where I accuse you of the obvious insinuation of your statement . . . and we go on some sort of other tangent.

Your article is by Justus R Hope MD. There are books on Covid and ivermectin by this author. As well as books about cancer and another about a coffee diet.

The article was not about climate. I said nothing about climate. I was thinking nothing about climate. Climate was not alluded to. Climate has nothing to do with COVID or the vaccine topic. I just looked at the article again and saw no ads about climate - maybe you saw one. Then you're lumping all posters together like they are one person. Unplug. Take a vacation. Go save a wallaby. I hear they poop in cubes.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/24/ivermectin-covid-peru-misinformation "But much of the harm had been done, said Garcia. Ivermectin had given people a false sense of security against the virus, making it difficult for public health officials to later dispel unproven claims about the drug." Ever notice on a map South America is so far east if heading south from most parts of North America a person would end up in the Pacific, not South America?

A quick google search of anything Allan posts is all that is needed. Same with the Nigerian study.

Yes I know. Want to see if these things work both ways . . .

A Nigerian study from 2011 has claimed that 85% of men on ivermectin became infertile

https://becomingchristians.com/2017/07/17/are-you-limiting-god/ Great, now I've got a sudden interest in titles with question marks asking leading . . . Stuff . . . There goes my evening

Censoring information? Who? Where? The age of information means developing skills to sort through unlimited information.

Do toilets really swirl in the opposite direction where you are or is it an optical illusion because you are standing upside down?

This is still a mystery to me. https://massivesci.com/notes/covid-vaccine-mrna-moderna-pfizer-delivery/ Doesn't appear as site specific as I hoped . . . or as designed for a specific destination . . . just more of a "this seems to work"

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/05/scicheck-posts-distort-testimony-of-federal-health-officials-on-employee-vaccinations/

Well he presented the "Overall Public Health vs Individual Health Decision" dichotomy which is a relevant discussion to have. Maybe if you teased out both sides of this you wouldn't come across as an anti-establishment mother earth alternative medicine conspiracy fanatic horse-worm haruspex reading into anything any doctor or political figure says about anything.