Bolshevik

I don't know what Jesus said. But Kenyon? Wrote a Father and His Family. Cult is Family. I'm sure vpw wanted to be seen as Daddy.

Maybe to look scholarly?

No he had green robes or black ones. Or a different color. Maybe they weren't robes. But they definitely wore them.

So, if there's a mantle to pass, one must simply find the mantle?

Well see, you must first understand to divide the Holy Fook into slices.

That's important because each of us should feel inspired to do the same. Since there can only be one at a time, that's a huge margin for failure.

I can't verify VPW ever even existed. I never met him. The people I have always known claim he's The MOG. I'll understand later. No unlearning to do and stuff.

Link isn't working for me but multiple sights say different things. We shouldn't appeal to authority, we defer to authority, holding fast to that which is true, a wayfer might argue.

So, if, "Doctor" is discredited, one would think it all falls to pieces. But if "Father" and "MOG" take root it's like we can ignore that one thing.

I think Nathan mention appeal to authority earlier as a fallacy. (He was also called Father, and MOG, which takes it other places)

"Doctor" was to make people think he knew stuff about things. People followed as an appeal to authority?

Will fine point pens be replaced by some sort of hyperlinks on ebooks? How do I virtue signal my spirituality without rewriting a whole book in the margins?

*shrugs* The nuclear form. Anything involving commitment. With the internet is there any need for family structure? It takes a village, right?

Neither. Tribal families I think are more keen to result in communism. Other types fascist. There's at least 8 types.

Maybe. If one chirp makes you jump, is that on you or the chirp? I think the idea is that a more docile, placated, group of people is easier to manipulate. The individualistic culture we enjoy, which typically demands personal responsibility, as far as I understand is a result of the egalitarian nuclear model. It's this structure that younger and younger generations will not reinforce.

I've stated I was introduced to GSC by my wife and others posters here at the time. Before that, I had bad experiences with the internet. The internet affects all, whether engaged or not.

I think of Mike as a mirror. He's just an image to be shadow boxed if inclined. Maybe he really exists somewhere, I will never know. This is the internet.

The internet is key to the disruption of the family unit. How families are built influences what religion and politics dominate. You point out how political dictators censor information to maintain control. The various types of family units of course are all smaller systems. The internet helps errode interpersonal boundaries by introducing many new ones all the time. Thus family structures must dissolves and new systems grow. This polamorus result is likely fertile ground for the rise of dictatorships, some would argue.

Yes, it's important that everyone, everywhere of all ages knows exactly who is banging who, and we know this via the internet. By reading, we can judge others not on our experience with them, but because IT IS WRITTEN.

I'm sure there's a name for this phenomenon.

Is the Research Department where they developed different materials for the wooden spoon?

Do I know that I know that I know that I know that I know? Is that emphatic? I don't know.

Ask Mike to point to what color he feels?

Is this about the renewed mind? I read an article once. You could call me an expert.

I used a snapper to mow the grass at HQ, getting every blade to the same height, spiritually. Other times, I used the hopper.