Bolshevik

the fossil record demonstrates creationism better than evolution theory. organism types just appear or disappear. transitional fossils between one type of organism and another are not shown. with the frogs, the oldest fossil I've heard of is 100's of millions of years old, and it looked just like a frog. Same body plan as frogs have today. It's like this with a lot of organisms. Any fossils the evolutionist think demonstrate evolution turn out to be one organism type or another, but never a real transitional organism.

http://www.fossil-museum.com/fossils/aramatur.php This guy has a great site of living fossils. Pictures of fossils and their living counterparts. There's a 50 million year old fossil of a frog. Frogs came from and always give rise to frogs.

Congrats TL!!

http://www.vision.org/visionmedia/article.aspx?id=1886 (This thread just reminded me of this quote)

I think they'll still at HQ, at least a few years ago anyway.

Move over God, Your Word is here.

This site has some interesting articles. Here's one on whale evolution. Even talks about some of the "vestigial" organs. http://www.harunyahya.com/articles/70natio...aphic_sci29.php

I heard a few years ago they replaced the in residence corps doing bless patrol with a safety officer. They couldn't keep an eye on those in-residence enough. (They were doing naughty things ).

So if one were to read the Bible, how does one come up with "The Law of Believing" and all the rules?

what do you make of the prophets being "sawn asunder" by believing? and those not receiving the promise?

The Law of Believing is the most ambiguous concept on Earth. Talk to any wayfer, they replace every verb with "believe" "believing" and may favorite "believingly" twi does not respect God, Scripture or Jesus Christ. They hold vpw about Jesus Christ as Lord. They hold the Word above God. Scripture is not accepted unless it was processed through the mind of vpw.

where's the "entertaining insane fuzzy rodents" option?

twi tells the housekeepers to believe while cleaning a toilet that the clean toilet will minister healing to all that use it. twi is weird.

I didn't realize A-Rod will be passing 500 homers this season? I guess I don't care if Barry breaks the record, because how many players will break the record again in the coming years?

I guess I do because I don't know enough to argue against it, and, I don't really see why it's important anyway. So I haven't looked into those two things at all. If there is a devil I don't know what powers he really does or does not have. I would assume he influences people somehow. I hear he eats dust and crawls on his belly.

If he were sorry he'd spew info necessary to shake the last of lemmings from the tree. What is the true purpose of twi Mr. lcm?

Could you please explain this? Where does this statement come from? Why does twi mention at most every service? What does it mean?

Many times I would be in challenging situations, (or in Wayish, having an opportunity to believe), and I would try to confide in what I thought would be a competent people. I would start explaining my situation, and almost every time, in the middle of my explanation they would interrupt and say "No, no. Don't confess a negative." As if stating the facts would make the situation worse. So what I learned was to never tell anyone your problems and act like you're oblivious to them yourself. The key to your problems is to mentally act like everything is peachy, when everything ain't. (Oops! I just confessed a negative. Here cometh the Adversary!)

Their bums shall be corked with with grape tomatoes . . .

Skunks can do a number on the lawn. They shall secure the perimeter. When everyone comes running out . . . he he. Although everyone will already be dosed with tomato, which I hear helps remove the skunk smell. This could be used to say that the attack was done in a loving manner. Or, we could claim to have never met the skunks before.

We could get flying squirrels, with tomato helmets. An air attack from the balcony!

so they'll be angry squirrels, remember who we're throwing them at?

no no, live ones. They'll scramble all over the stage, sliding all over the tomato paste. Woodchucks would be cool, but they would be heavier and harder to toss. Chipmunks could be shot like buckshot I guess, but would be harder to see from the audience. Squirrels are ideal, they have those fluffy tails that can be used for tossing, and they're easier to see. I think they have a lot more personality too.

Can we throw squirrels?

Hello Ephesians 4:32. How old is the earth?