Bolshevik

?

I meant like the sense of balance. and uh, how does it interact with these "centers of references" without using the five senses? (which have been popularized for simplification)

okay, what is this outside source?

Five senses? Still only five senses?

another thread . . .

If something can't be found, it must be lost. WOW. This like some Egyptian mummy hunting, hieroglyphic interpreting, ,. . . something. You know, there are blog options on this site?

What does this mean? Did vpw lose it? How did he know it was lost?

I don't remember, because vpw was a terrible teacher.

Ah, answering a question with a question, very jesusey.

has the power come back on? hope you're doing well

Wait, are you saying there was a point to "The Class"? That, is a different thread entirely.

Was WW likening lcm's purge's to what Waysider described? What Waysider described is being likened to what is described in what appears to be a poem about Nazi party takeover?

When this thread was started I immediately thought of two things, thermodynamic energies and reference electrodes. We don't know the true internal energy of anything. But we compare things relative to each other, and the math seems to work just fine. Reference electrodes, even working electrodes, those always annoyed me. But again, relative measurements, and industry standards (multiple). An explanation is like starring at a man in the distance who is standing in tall grass. We don't know the height of the man, because he's hidden by the grass (is he standing on a rock, or in a hole?). You could use his unknown height and compare it to say, a giraffe standing next to him. You don't know the "real" height of either. I hear physicists are trying to distill all the known science down to one equation. Newtonian physics was combined under relativity. Combining those with the quantum world has been an obstacle. But there is a belief that these will be combined someday. That may happen, if it hasn't already. But even then something will pop up that doesn't fit the new understanding. So separate ways of viewing the universe will come up again. They are not opposed, neither is wrong, just different. Half thoughts, I know. So why couldn't we have multiple rules of faith and practice?

Groups were fellowshipping that formed immediately following the lawsuit announcement. I don't know what became of them. I don't remember if that was before or after lcm was booted. He remained loyal to twi, and probably never tried to build a following. I know there are still plenty in twi who would welcome him back with open arms.

how?

Perhaps something like this causes people to follow guys like lcm. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7927

alimony or whatever. he's got two jobs Gr@cie should be old enough soon. he isn't someone to worry about imo

*question's Mike's very existence*

Who was ever loyal to lcm? A wayfer is only loyal to their own fantasy.

I'm wondering if I'm now wondering about the same thing you're not admitting to wondering about . . .

*munches on popcorn*

I remember once my folks came home from an Advanced Class Special and threw a bunch of my favorite toys away because they contained devil spirits. oh, the danger of toys . . .

I don't get it. a movie? Star Trek?

I can't help, but it wouldn't suprise me. People in twi today know that lcm inherited his sex problems from vpw. It doesn't bother them. PFAL full of bull? That's OK . . . that's OK.

So wayfers are liars . . .ha, I knew it.