GT

Actually, when a TWIt deposits money in TWI's credit union, the credit union owes that TWIt the money and must pay interest on that money to the TWIt. TWI's credit union is basically borrowing money from TWIts. On it's balance sheet, it's treated as a liability. That's hypocrisy.

Got who's chatting to show who is in both rooms now. Just call me GreasyHacker.

Given that the vote is so close, we are required to do a manual recount. We have a team in the back room inspecting all the pregnant chads.

This is pretty neat. Couple are able to change their clothes in an instant. Full article: http://www.slate.com/id/2138613/?nav=tap3 Direct to the video: http://img.slate.com/media/48/060324_No1_QuickChange_110.asf The question is, how do they do it?

The poll results so far are surprising me. There were so many complaints about FlashChat, I assumed this would be a no-brainer.

Up to 19 posts on the thread now. Only 57 more to go. ;)

I have the first 8 posts pulled in. Slow process. I'll finish it latter. Until then, the topic is closed until the remaining posts are pulled in. The topic is over in the GreaseSpot 101 forum.

Let me see if I can manually pull it in. I'd like to preserve who posted what and the dates. Let me see what I can do.

This issue is on another thread. http://www.greasespotcafe.com/ipb/index.ph...ndpost&p=225015 http://www.greasespotcafe.com/ipb/index.ph...ndpost&p=225034

Until you fart in the wrong direction and are dropped liked yesterday's trash. We had this in high school also. It was called STUDY HALL. Oral teachings = Sunday Teaching Services, aka STS Written plublications = The Way Magazine, aka The Way Rag. This is not research. This is going over stuff they've heard at least 20 times before they ever showed up at Gunnison. Repitition, for TWI, is good. It ensures they can regurtitate and spew it forth properly.

Your point escapes me. Could you elaberate?

It's only showing if someone is actually in the room, even though I told it to show always. I'll see if I can fix it later....

A couple quick FYI's: 1) The link for Live Chat is on the top menu, just below the banner. 2) Live Chat opens in the same window in a fixed size. If you want to resize the window, click the Float button (3rd button from the right) to pop out the chat into it's own window. It then can be resized.

An investigation has been launched for some time now into voting irregularities in regard to that poll.

The "Who's Chatting" at the bottom of the board index has been changed to show who is in "Live Chat". We'll keep it this way for a week or so, see how it goes. Then we'll tally up the totals, submit the results to Paw, who will pick which one he likes irregardles of the voting. Just kidding.....

The thread was post-waydale, during the 1 1/2 years when GS was on EZBoard

I have it. Just trying to think of a way to bring it in while preserving who posted what in an organized manner. It's about 50 posts long.

This thread was a casualty of the move off EZBoard to the site preceding this one. Maybe when I have a large block of time, I'll attempt importing them into here. Been toying with the idea, but not an easy thing to do.

".art" is not a known image file to the board. jpeg and gif work.

Thanks HAPe4me. Forgot to mentiont that comments are definetly needed here.

You still have the original? If so, send them to me and I'll type them up and post them here. Pat's only got about 16 of the 35 pages. I'd love put it together in something besides PDF, something search able, with an index...

For those of us who were not at the meeting, or even ever heard of it, please provide more details.

As for her listing her "training" in the corps, I have two problems with it. She lists it in her Training section as: It is a false statement, a lie. It is not a "Corporate Leadership Training Program." It has nothing to do with corporate training and TWI never bills it as such. It has nothing to do with what her resume is targeted at, writing services. Unless the person reading this resume knows anything about TWI, and the odds of that are pretty slim, it adds nothing to it. If she managed to get to the interview point, it only serves for the interviewer to ask what it is -- at which point, I suppose, she could witness to the person. I don't know about you, but an interview is not quite the right place to be looking for a witnessing opportunity.

She is advertising herself as a "A seasoned professional—proficient as a proofreader, writer and editor," yet she has a typo on her resume. Even worse, it's in reference to her work for TWI: Seems to be inconsistant use of a period as a bullet point and sentence end also. Not that I'm picky, but typos on resumes, especially for a writer, are unforgivable. I've gone through quite a few resumes in interviewing people for Information Technology jobs, where good writing skills is not a requirement, yet a blatant typo on the resume is a killer. If you haven't taken the time to make sure your resume is correct, how can I know the work you're going to be doing isn't going to get the same kind of treatment? Always check and recheck your resume. Then have someone else proof read it before sending it out.