Jump to content
GreaseSpot Cafe

Ductape

Members
  • Posts

    1,417
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Everything posted by Ductape

  1. True because even I couldn't stick with them.........
  2. It's good now, Thanks!
  3. Yes but the post times are 2 hours off :unsure: Guess I will go check settings. Now I am only an hour off, :wacko:
  4. Now I don't feel so bad about 20+ years
  5. Did the clock-setter of the Cafe' forget, or do we have to do our own springing forward? "damn it"
  6. Everything was grand and glorious in the promised land, "WE" were the problem, so they got rid of a lot of us. Then they got rid of LCM, "HE" was the problem and everything was going to get "right-as-rain" and now they have new corps holding out until things get better or they will be able to "FIX" TWI? Could it be that we weren't the problem? Could it be LCM was only the tip of the iceburg as far as what the problem was/is? Could it be the whole thing is a train wreck and always has been? If the good old TWI was the unbroken standard I could tell you where some VPW worshiping and quoting folks hang out calling all who post here possessed or over medicated because we accept the testimonies against their hero elder. Yes, we "hear" a word against he that betrayed us with his sexual perversion. Perhaps serving the Lord should become the priority.
  7. Once moving some single guys a bit of soft porn was seen in a box by the LC, he covered it and said what ever we do don't let his wife see those. Another time a TC let a newbie stay in their basement and his wife saw some stashed porn and he and his devil spirit pictures had to go. LCM taught some devil spirit name was where we get the word pornography from and it was wrong. Now he and some other women than his wife "Kodak" moments are said to have helped at least one law suit. As with all things Way, no way did they have a set rule.
  8. Ductape

    Banning Booing

    If banning boo's leads to banning boo bies, we have to put a stop to this right now!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  9. Ductape

    Banning Booing

    I am boo zing in the boo nedocks with my boo ne hat on, picking my nose, I booo your boo boo ing; boo boo
  10. For that chunk of change I'd do your laundry
  11. A little of the other side of the story. Jake was 17 when this happened.
  12. I question that all the strays are dumped, for many a city dweller claims the right of their pets to roam free. Doggies choose a life without shelter and regular food to run free, animal kingdom and all. My bleeding heart liberal sibling joined in causes like animal rights and still keeps 2 rather large dogs and numerous cats. But one of her big lugs is hyper and wags it tail to destruction. That in itself is fine, but she now has these precious babies that will call her grandma when they grow some. The big lug Copper goes out on his chain to save the babies from damage of the tail or being knocked over in excitement. Now Copper has a dog house, can reach a great covered porch, is given water numerous times a day (he likes to tip the dish over) and never goes without food. Sister's neighbor decided that the poor dog out there in the cold was abuse and Copper got a visit from animal control. Animal control officer was upset when other huge mellow dog was in the warm house and decided to take Copper away. The only thing that saved Copper, whom sister had rescued from animal shelter sure death, was that animal control is county there, sister is city police dispatcher, new animal control officer oops big time. Copper gets to come in as soon as the babies go home. That is just one more story I am full of where rights of decent animal lovers are violated by an over reactive animal rights activists.
  13. Darn, any time but that (or any other time) would have worked for me :blink:
  14. FoS works for me (Full Of ........)
  15. Not even close, so if I PM you accept it will ya?
  16. You should know. PM me if you want to know why you should know.
  17. Chatty, I have to agree about love the creator more than the creation. Sorry that this isn't the right place for what I have to post. Of course the control freak lefties always have that attitude when the subject doesn't go their way. (Not about you Dot) The question to me isn't who suffers how, rather I will not go to jail for your neglect or abuse of an animal, but I would risk jail for a baby. Other words, your dog is not worth a trip to jail for me. Criminal activity should be punished no matter how "right" people perceive the reason for the violation. And I have been charged head on by a bull.
  18. See any where I said commies, ya socialist! I have been involved in legal removal of animals from abusive owners such as cock-fighting illigals. I once stopped a person from breaking the windows of a car with 3 dogs in it and the windows rolled up on a 90 degree day. Police popped the lock and towed the car after animal control took the dogs. Had it been a baby we would have broken the windows and taken the what ever followed with pride. But you are ignorant as to what is going on removing rights across this country, now go be a good guardian to the governments pets will ya?
  19. Speaking of being full of crap I haven't said it was right for animals to suffer, your all for rights being taken away to protect the innocent? So you are for the patriot act, right? No warrent needed to search or remove property?
  20. Rules forbid me for telling you what kind of slug you are. Did your wife need to drive? Oh, I forgot more die every year on our roads than did on 9-11. My bad. You have no idea about what a hard-a$$ I really am. But, I still won't claim gawd almighty while sending anyone into a dangerous program. I would be glad to put your so tough self through one of my "special" programs. Just sign a waver and pay extra! If you think any higher power works in the hearts of the men that promoted this, you belong with the blind being lead by the blind, TYVM......
  21. Enjoy calling your pet "your" as there are all ready places that it is illegal to claim ownership of animals. In those liberal extreme communities you are a guardian or a person of responsibility and the pets belong to the local government. Great for protecting animals rights, but if you tick me off I can call authorities and have your home invaded and your pet removed while they review your guardianship of "their" animal. I would say a very slippery slope to be on. Yet in these havens of liberalism meth-labs operate and neighbors call in about the constant flow of traffic through a residential area, everyone knows what they are doing behind boarded up windows yet there is no probable cause for enforcement to go in. Bears? I missed eggs for breakfast. But, a man is guiding a large group on a nature horse-packing trip into a wilderness area when a sow grizzly stands and starts attacking pack-string and peoples' lives are threatened. Two mules go over a cliff and are laying there busted to pieces suffering. Man shoots the bear which happened to be only 75 miles out of its legal habitat. People were very close to following the fate of those mules when this man acted, man lost everything he owned to pay fines and also was given a jail sentence. Just one of numerous stories you don't read about or see on your nightly news. Why, because it goes against those animal rights extremists. Not one bear scratch was found on any human! So invoke God, I will point out what my "take" is. The a$$ in that story wasn't more valuable than the man, the man became of less value than the a$$ because he was going to do what? As I said before, because the authorities didn't act in what that woman thought was a timely manner, rather than pursuing legal recourse she took it upon herself to be judge and jury and violate other peoples rights. So none of you would have a problem when I blow the gangster away when he is breaking into my home, right?
  22. I think it is one hell of a slippery slope when "your cause" allows your actions to be above the law. How many scream and cry about fictitious loss of rights over the Patriot Act but don't hesitate to take away the legal rights and due course of others for "their cause"? How many think its good when criminals walk away because the criminals rights were violated? Giving any extremist group the rights over a society to enforce "their cause" while taking away legal rights to privacy and private property without due course is not worth what is being saved. Oh, and I have seen animals in the described condition and worse "rescued", also animals from extended abuse suffering every day of their lives after being "rescued". Now I would say that is a terrible place for a society to be. But then there are some that do think animal life is equal to human life, or more honestly more valuable. But then speaking out against such a purely emotional "cause" as animal rights automatically makes a person a dick.
×
×
  • Create New...