waysider

How so? Are you saying Wierwille was wrong when he taught this?

If you're that convinced believing works, you should have no problem believing the jab won't hurt you.

In the Advanced Class, Wierwille talked about how, when they were about to enter kindergarten, he was informed his kids would need to be up to date with their shots. He said he told the authorities that God would protect them from the harm of any disease by virtue of his believing. They weren't persuaded. It was then, he said, that it occurred to him that, if he could believe for them to be untouched by disease, he could just as easily believe for them to be unharmed by the shots. This is, of course, simply rationalization. I, personally, no longer subscribe to the so called "law of believing". For those who do, however, it raises the specter on how it all fits with the current situation. Can you believe away the damages of Covid? Can you believe away any potential harm from a vaccine? Food for thought.

Oh, you mean that country that is known for heightened awareness of personal hygiene?

Only if they don't believe in time travel.

".........the wayfaring men, though fools, shall not err therein." I wish you could see it in the original. It had one of these at the end:........ /s

My dad didn't believe ketchup had any special powers. It was just his way of saying, "Eat it and don't complain.".

Reminds me of my dad when we turned our noses up at something on the dinner table. "Put some ketchup on it."

I think I'll wait and see if seatbelts save lives.

I just got my test back and it's 42.

I really don't know much about it. I was just curious if this is what Oldies was talking about. I don't think an antibody test is going to give you the data you want because antibodies fade rather quickly. T-cell and B-cell presence is what is key, as these are the long-term cells that generate antibodies.

TEST

Yoda you are.

Of course you are. The data did not tell us the patients' ages, whether they were obese or if they had comorbidities so you thought it was okay to simply invent some data. (build a patient profile) That is definitely not okay.

This is just stubborn ignorance. Do yourself and everyone else a favor by educating yourself on how the vaccine works. As it is, it looks like you don't have a clue. We don't know how long natural immunity lasts or how strong it will be for any one particular individual because we don't know that individual's exposure level. Dosage is controlled with the vaccine and so we can make more calculated projections. You say you have had Covid twice now. This is a bit distressing when you consider the long-running success your country had with low infection rates. How did you manage to get infected not once but twice? How long was it between your first and second infection? How long do you expect it to be before your third.... or fourth or fifth?

You're still trying to build a patient profile without any statistical evidence to justify your conclusion.

Covid by age 11/10/2021: HERE

The graph is clearly dated at the bottom. These are the numbers for Monday, 11/15/2021. The link shows other days that offer some perspective. There is no (zero) information to indicate patient age or general health status. You have assumed these details in an effort to create a fictitious patient profile. This is dishonest and dangerous. If anything, there is a good chance these are a younger demographic than we saw in the early pandemic because a high percentage of the elderly have already been vaccinated. But, we don't know that for certain. I think it's a fair assumption, though.

It was a flawed study. You can read about it HERE.

A direct quote from the article: “These events are often coincidental, rather than being caused by the vaccine, therefore any attempts to link the two based on a temporal association alone is misleading,”

"ANY vaccines.....are ALWAYS too late." This is what you said, did you not? .

This is what you said: "Any vaccinations conjured up for for flu type viruses (including covid) are always too late because the virus mutates a multitude of times before the shots even ministered." This is a direct quote from the article: "the composition of flu vaccines is reviewed annually, and vaccines are updated to protect against the viruses that research indicates will be most common during the upcoming flu season." Do you honestly not see what's wrong with your claim?

I'm still waiting for your evidence.

I'm not sure you realize this, Allan, but this article offers no evidence to back the claim you made that I questioned.

Your evidence?