waysider

"Before the beginning, there was this turtle. And the turtle was alone. And he looked around, and he saw his neighbor, which was his mother. And he lay down on top of his neighbor, and behold! she bore him in tears an oak tree, which grew all day and then fell over -- like a bridge. And lo! under the bridge there came a catfish. And he was very big. And he was walking. And he was the biggest he had seen. And so were the fiery balls of this fish, one of which is the sun, and the other, they called the moon." Source: (Begins at 8:05)

42 is the number of times you can get away with saying "Lo Shanta Lo Maka See Tay Beep Beep Boop" before someone realizes you're really just babbling.

"Some Evangelicals have labelled the conservative or traditional view as "verbal, plenary inspiration of the original manuscripts", by which they mean that each word (not just the overarching ideas or concepts) was meaningfully chosen under the superintendence of God".......Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_inspiration#cite_note-12...Thy Word is Truth (E.J. Young) NOTE: I slaved over a hot google stove all day to find that. Okay, I lied. It took about 5 minutes.

Have an upvote for the 42 reference.

Dweeb (드위브) is a pet food/ pet supply company, located in Seoul. So, yeah, your point still stands. Associating with them will assure your life will "go to the dogs". And that, my friends, is how a word study can lead you to somewhere you never expected.

주입 (jueeb)

Why look outside the box when we have this to guide us? 2 Petered out 1:3 His divine power VPW hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of Him PFAL that hath called us to glory and virtue.

Lambano, laballo, ballo, ball, throw , throw it out there... That's it! That's it! You're speaking the wonderful works of self delusion!

Materials for "Working The Word": 1. sturdy shoe horn. 2. ample supply of goose grease. 3. large supply of logical fallacies.

Interesting video. For me, at least, it reinforces the futility of trying to come to a complete understanding of what the authors of scripture meant to convey. Using interlinears and word studies to attempt this is like trying to explain quantum physics to a 5 year old. Yeah, I know, there will be people who will say if you pray about it or speak in tongues more, the eyes of your understanding will be enlightened. I guess you can convince yourself of almost anything if you're driven to do so. On a side note, I used to work with someone who was born and raised in an Asian country and for whom English is a second language. I am a casual student of that particular language and culture, so I used her knowledge as a sounding board to try to increase my linguistic ability. It was often frustrating for her to explain my errors to me because she said that to switch between languages, required her to think in two radically different ways. One of the big differences she cited was that, in English, we tend to think in terms of "I' and me". Whereas, in her language, even though it's quite possible to express yourself like that, it would be considered egotistical and rude if done more often than necessary to establish the context. So, I think the point I'm trying to make is that this concept goes beyond the way specific words mold our perceptions.

You know you're in a cult when you start looking for ways to justify that what you're in is not a cult.

I fear you may be right.

The second wave of a tsunami: That's the one that drags you away from the safety of solid ground and sucks the life out of you.

Please don't wake me up too late.....

Except that we worked without commission.

A well executed relevé can lift you closer to God.

A large percentage of Biblical scholars are of the opinion that I Timothy, II Timothy and Titus were authored by someone other than Paul. Paul is thought to have died in about 65 CE. These books appear to have been written about 35 years later.

Maybe some of those subscribers are just curious onlookers. You know, like rubberneckers at a bad freeway wreck.

I'm thinking it was BG Leonard, but it's been too long to remember for sure. I know we covered it here, years ago, on some now forgotten thread.

Sorry for the incorrect link. You summed up, quite nicely, the point I was trying to make. Twinky, It's important because Wierwille used what Pillai was purporting in order to give a sense of credibility to his own claims. That gave us a false sense of confidence. It made us feel like we could trust this guy (VPW) to help us fill a perceived void in our lives.

The AC syllabus lists, on page 20, Isaiah 27:1 and Matthew 12:43 as references to Leviathan being the spirit causing alcoholism. If you can figure out how Leviathan is connected to alcoholism, you're one up on me.

I don't personally put a lot of stock in anything Pillai wrote about oriental customs. He was legitimately credentialed in statistics and mathematics, but his expertise in ancient oriental customs seems to be self-appointed. In fact, there exists a thread on GSC that took a critical look at some of his pronouncements on oriental customs. The findings were less than favorable.