waysider

Ahhh! Parenthood. It's that time in life when you really begin to understand the meaning of the word"dilemma". If you get them their shots, it might have an adverse effect. If you DON'T get them their shots, they can't go to school. Hang in there Mrs. B., we're all pulling for you . And speaking of pulling, before you know it, they will be asking to borrow the car and you'll be "pulling" your hair out. You'll look back and smile and reflect on how big our God really is.

Would you care to be a bit more specific regarding what it is that you find "not good"? I'm curious to know how you plan to determine who warrants your dismissal.

Actually, I think that may be one of those much heralded "figures of speech". I can't remember the Aramaic or Greek name for it but I think it loosely translates---------"stick figure". Davey--- Davey Crockett King of the wild frontier.

exwaycorps We had a very interesting discussion of this subject in late Jan. or early Feb. dmiller started he topic and it spanned several pages. I am not sure how to get you back there except to maybe look at topics that he initiated. Sorry, I'm still kinda low-tech.

"Vintage" Ronnie with Big Walter

Ronnie Earl and The Broadcasters featuring Darrell Nulisch

krys. Cataract surgery and LASIK are two different things. LASIK involves surgically altering the structure of the cornea(the outer surface of the eye) in order to change its refractive power. Cataract surgery involves removing the natural lens from inside the eye and (usually) replacing it with an artificial lens called an IOL(Intra- ocular lens) It used to be quite a medical ordeal. It,too, has advanced to the point of being an out-patient procedure in most cases. I just wanted to point out that they(LASIK and cataract surgery) are not performed for the same purpose.

'ell if I know! Oops, sorry. That was the answer to the riddle. Never mind

I must be getting slow; I just now got it. Loy, the "package" handler. HaHaHaHa!

My 2 cents: I think it is possible to criticize the program itself without criticizing the participants or their experiences. Hitching is a good example. Many people hitched and never had a bad experience with it. Still, that doesn't lend credability to the actual practise of hitching. Hitching is not a safe method of transportation.(and it's illegal) I'm not criticizing those who have done it, I'm criticizing the practise of requiring people to do it. And the list goes on . The point, though, is that it's the practises,not the participants or their experiences that should be scrutinized.

Well, actually, there is a whole story behind B.B. naming his guitars(yes, there have been multiples) Lucille. He tells the story on a couple of his recordings. He did not know Lucille and, in fact, never even met her. She was a barmaid at a juke joint where he had a very harrowing experience one night. He names his guitars Lucille to remind him to never make the same mistake that almost cost him his life that night. Now back to Ronnie. I know he credits his wife with supporting him and helping him work through some very trying times as he battled with addiction and depression. BUT!--Is her name Donna?----Not sure.

I'm not 100% sure but I think Donna is his wife. I'll have to see if I can find out for sure.

Ronnie Earl

Could be a spoonful of water Save you from the desert sand Just a spoon of LEAD from my 45 Gonna save you from another man. --------Spoonful---------Willie Dixon

Keep your hands where I can see them. Hand me a Guinness Extra Stout and nobody gets hurt. Compeesh?

Here's a good reason not to hitchhike-----------IT'S ILLEGAL! It has been for as long as I can remember( at least where I grew up in Ohio.) Wierwille and his cronies were from Ohio. Surely it must have come to their attention at some point that they were asking people to do something illegal. I hitched extensively as a kid.(Even though it was illegal.) Probably no less than 10 or 15 times a week. I knew people who got robbed and beat up. That didn't stop me. I was in a car that picked me up that was in an accident. That didn't stop me. I knew someone who got a ride from Cleveland to L.A. That encouraged me. Did I continue to hitch because I believed God would cover for me? Heck no, this was pre-TWI. I continued because I was a foolish kid who thought he was invincible. One night, after I started going to twig, I had a potentially life ending experience as I hitched. I managed to come out of it OK and it prompted me to SIT out loud, for the very first time, right there on a public street, at the top of my voice to give praise to GOD for my deliverance. Is the glass half full or half empty? I could have been killed ---But!---- I spoke in tongues for the first time. There's a reason it's against the law. It doesn't take a Biblical Scholar to figure out what that reason is.

Spiritual Hitchhiking Or Carjacking? thread----July 19, 2006 This is my first reference.(There are others also) O.K. I hope I don't derail but sometimes we old folks get lost in the moment. Back in about '71 or '72 I got witnessed to by some kids who seemed pretty excited about twig fellowship. I went to a couple of fellowships and was really blown away by SIT.(o.k. ,one of the young ladies caught my eye but that's another story). After 2 or 3 twig meetings I decided to try this SIT stuff myself. Nobody told me you had to have a class so I just went ahead and did it. Next day I tell the TL about it. HE gives me a "lift list" and a WAY MAG. This sounds remotely like my vasectomy experience but again I digress.First up, Joe B. Leever needs a car. I envision him driving a shiny new Caddy and SIT. Wow, this is easy! Next, I envision this "DR." from the WAY RAG as he stands behind a podium about to expound,but just then he grins from ear to ear, flips me the bird and mouths those two little words we all know too well.( I kid you not this really happened). My TL says it's probably just un-renewed mind and to strive to block it out. In retrospect, I wonder if that middle finger wasn't really his thumb and those words really "Goin' my WAY?"

There are a lot of really terrific people at GSC who are of the opinion that VPW had good intentions initially but became corrupt. I respect that. They may be right. Personally, though, I think VP was running a scam from the very beginning. That's my opinion. I could be wrong. There were lots of warning signs along the way that I only see clearly as I now look at it all in retrospect. One of those signs was an event during which I believe God let me know in no uncertain terms that something was very wrong with "the good doctor" 's modus operandi. It was no "small, still voice". It was graphic and startling. I didn't know what to make of it at the time. It's taken me over 35 years to start to understand it. I have posted on it before. Well, that's my opinion& you know what they say about opinions------------ "Opinions are like butt cracks----everybody has one."

I never intended to dispute anyone's positive experience or refute the fact that people did, in fact, come away with some valuable lessons learned. If I came across that way, I apologize. Waysider.

You are correct. Jimmy Jones did the original. You probably have heard it but didn't know he was the artist. Even though it was a big hit for him, it was a MONSTER hit forJT. Aaaaand!------------Yer up!

Jonny I see your point about bad things happening .----------I really do. And, I agree with a good deal of it. But, the point is, that after some of these bad things happened, upper leadership should have reevaluated whether the benefits outweighed the risks. Even if you take the ethical, emotional, spiritual aspect out of the formula, it doesn't make good business sense to continue on in the fashion which they did when they knew the potential for disaster. They acted irresponsibly(IMO) by continuing to march forward when it was demonstrated to them that this was not a wise course of action. They(upper TWI management) turned a blind eye to how continuation of this program could have seriously adverse effects for some participants, even though there were obviously some who reaped benefits. It was another example of the "one size fits all" approach that TWI liked to take. As a leader, you need to find people's strong suits and give them challenges that will help them more fully develop them. For some, that may be physical challenge. For others, that may be a challenge to grow artistically. Point is--------One shoe doesn't fit everybody. Maybe there was a moral lesson in Cinderella, after all.

Porgy Tirebiter-----------He's a student like you.

Well, of course, there was Rachel, who, although she did not die at LEAD, died due to the repercussions of the LEAD accident.

I whisper sweet things, You tell all your friends. They'll come runnin' to me.