waysider

Oh, well PARDON me!!!!

Hi there, WG I'm trying to understand something here. Were you Susie Peon Believer or were you Barbara Susie Peon Believer? HeeHeeHee! Just funnin' with ya. I'm sure nobody here has any idea what the heck that's all about. Now say "Good Night", Short Stuff!!

That's a good point, Krys. Lots of beneficial developments came of the space program, as well, that no one could have ever foreseen. http://www.thespaceplace.com/nasa/spinoffs.html

Kinda reminds me of the guy who thought he would have a bit of fun with the stock boy at the local grocery. "Young man, can you tell me where I might find the rooster eggs?" "Yes, sir", he replied, "They're one aisle over from the bull's milk."

My sister-in-law, who has several cats and LARGE dogs, got leather furniture a few years ago. Ironically, the cats did minimal damage but the dogs completely trashed it with their toe nails as they climbed up. I suppose their weight may have been a big factor. The cats probably would have trashed it too, though, if the dogs hadn't beat them to the punch. Also, my sister-in-law keeps all her animals properly groomed so it wasn't because the nails had grown too long.

Jeff When a writer "borrows" something from another writer and deceitfully claims it to be his own, that is what most people would call plagiarism. It's not only unethical, it's illegal. When a writer "borrows" the works of another writer and claims it was given to him by divine revelation, or if said writer assembles works of several other writers and claims it was God who told him to assemble them in a prescribed manner, that's a spiritual travesty. When a writer willfully does the things I listed in paragraph two and uses those works to sate his own lustful and deviant desires, it's a travesty of epic proportions. BTW-- Thank you for putting forth the effort that it takes for you to post here. I know it is not easy using the computers at the public library.

Mike Have you ever sat down with a trained professional and discussed the possibility that you are suffering from a "delusional disorder"? I'm asking that question in all earnest. There is no malice intended.

"Rock and Roll has got to go!!"

That's a mighty powerful analogy, jeast. (The elephant and chain) Virginia Mae sounds like someone we all would be honored to know.

Hiya, Mike I haven't cracked open the cover of The Little Engine That Could for more than 50 years! I think I still have a pretty good idea whats in it. BTW--- I think that book was adapted from another one called The Pony Engine. Just thought I'd mention that.

This one is surreal!!!

That's cool stuff, jeast. Is that something you wrote?

Ya know One of the reasons I went into Fellow Laborers is because we were supposed to spend two years studying The Book Of Acts and then return to our hometowns, as better equipped leaders, to handle God's Word. But I gotta tell ya, I don't really know squat about The Book Of Acts. That might just be one of my biggest disappointments in how the program evolved. But, hey-------I'm just sayin'

I don't buy much through Amazon but my wife and son do. (Lots of books) They both have their own computers ,so how do I do this to insure proper credit is given? If it involves using my computer to do so, let me know and that's what we'll do.

Speak English, Mike It seems to be the most commonly used language on this site.

Here ya go!

Here's the "wiki" on Venn Diagrams. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venn_diagram Here's the "wiki" on Boolean Logic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boolean_logic Would you be so kind as to show me how this demonstrates that "all without exception" is somehow different from "all without distinction"? (What with me not being a computer engineer or mathematician, ya know?)

Here's the answer. Free post, anyone?

Treat everybody the way you would want them to treat you. Without that much, it's really just another Sunday School lesson.

You are joking, aren't you? That's, perhaps the most moronic explanation I've ever heard. Now, before you get your panties in a bunch, I did not call you a moron, I said the explanation was moronic. Try this, why don't you. Present that same demonstration to someone who knows nothing about TWI and observe their response. "All without exception" means the same thing as "all without distinction". You don't need a PhD in English to understand that.

WTH I suppose you might have some sort of point if you could actually demonstrate that the teaching on "private interpretation" is, itself, an accurate and "right dividing" of scripture. Kinda like defining a word without using it in the definition. By the way, you do realize you just called me an "idiot", don't you? That's OK-----I forgive you.

Well there you have it. Dr. claimed he got it by revelation(page 9 of JCNG /per Mike) so, of course, it must be true. I'll tell you that when you tell me how your commercial for PFAL is on topic. (Not the circular logic version.)

Just like Woodstock, it was based on an idealistic fantasy.