waysider

Are those the only 2 choices?

You need this spirit to speak in tongues much, which is a mandatory requirement for receiving revelation, as is detailed on the Keys To Walking By The Spirit page of the Advanced Class syllabus. It Is Written.

In the TV series, the sheriff and the town drunk were 2 different people.

This is not at all accurate.

I guess you must have better ears than me. I never heard them. Well, it's a moot point, anyhow, since, as far as I know, it's not in the written collaterals.

Not so fast. Its says talk to ,not listen to. One must be diligent in rightly dividing The Great Principle.

If you're going to use abbreviations while posting or writing, it's a good idea to spell the word or phrase out in full the first time, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses, to indicate what the abbreviation represents. Like this: Great Principle (GP)

The Da Vernci Code Coming soon to a fellowship near you.

Reinventing the Hula Hoop.

473 x 17.5 = Uhmm...a big number. Isn't that just tremendous?

Please allow me to sum it up for you. Once upon a time, there was a guy named Wierwille who claimed he had a doctorate. He lied. It was a mail order phony. The End. (They all lived happily ever after.)

Allow me to state this in the simplest way possible,. This statement is simply false. Error after error after error has been scrutinized here. Thread upon thread upon thread has dissected these errors in great detail. It's really not my fault you've chosen to reject the obvious. To demonstrate my point, suppose you select any "error" of your choosing and "go over it with great care" to demonstrate why our conclusions are incorrect. I'm not holding my breath.

The moon could fall out of the sky while we sleep and squash us all flatter that the winner of a Twiggy lookalike contest. Probably not likely to happen, though.

I just posted one possible solution. Did you not read it?

Wouldn't it be interesting if they simply folded up the tent and went out of business?

This is a false dilemma. It assumes these are the only 2 options possible.

You can't make someone fix something if they don't want to fix it.

When my son was in about 4th or 5th grade he said, "Hey, Dad, let's build a go-kart." I said, "OK, how will we make it go?" He said, "We'll put an old lawnmower engine on it." "Well, that sounds good", I said. "How will we make the engine turn the wheels?" So, God, who can only talk to spirit, teaches my spirit, which teaches my .......Hey! Wait a minute!

"If it's accurate" is the key phrase here that makes the difference.

I probably didn't state my point very well. What I mean is that, when commenting on J.J's writings, the focus should be on what he wrote and not who wrote it. If's it's accurate, it shouldn't matter who said it or whether he is an insider or an outsider..

J.J's criticisms should be based on content, not the man.

I understand how and why people might perceive them as pure, but, rest assured, they were far from pure or even relatively pure.

Meh. Mike disappears for extended periods of time and is unchanged when he returns. Gotta give him credit for one thing, though. He's thoroughly mastered that "Stand, no matter what!" schtick.