waysider

And where, pray tell, does this provision occur, outside of PFAL, which you just stated is not Biblical doctrine?

Help me understand. Are you now saying The Great Principle Should NOT be taken seriously? I mean, it's in the collaterals so it must be akin to Biblical doctrine. amiright? Oh, Hey, here's a fun thought. Maybe The Law of Believing shouldn't be taken seriously, either.

It's not difficult at all. You're saying that spirit can only speak to spirit but since your mind is physical, not spiritual, somehow some kind of fairy dust gets sprinkled that makes an exception to that rule, thus allowing spirit to talk to something that is not spirit. Is this something you found in the Book of Facetious?

I've said I'd never go back, but I might make an exception for that.

You're still missing a piece of the drivetrain, Mike. Spirit can only talk to spirit except when it's talking to... linkage. 'Cuz, ya see, the linkage is spirit even though it's not spirit. So spirit can talk to linkage because the linkage is ...what? I'm not claiming to be a Bible expert, but I don't recall every seeing that in any scripture. (We must study diligently to renew our linkages.)

...but, first, burn all your bridges behind you.

Jesus wept.

Snell would be proud of you. This is virtually how it works.

Jeepers! You'll never get a class together at that rate.

Would this not apply to Wierwille at the point in his life when he was producing the collaterals?

Are those the only 2 choices?

You need this spirit to speak in tongues much, which is a mandatory requirement for receiving revelation, as is detailed on the Keys To Walking By The Spirit page of the Advanced Class syllabus. It Is Written.

In the TV series, the sheriff and the town drunk were 2 different people.

This is not at all accurate.

I guess you must have better ears than me. I never heard them. Well, it's a moot point, anyhow, since, as far as I know, it's not in the written collaterals.

Not so fast. Its says talk to ,not listen to. One must be diligent in rightly dividing The Great Principle.

If you're going to use abbreviations while posting or writing, it's a good idea to spell the word or phrase out in full the first time, followed by the abbreviation in parentheses, to indicate what the abbreviation represents. Like this: Great Principle (GP)

The Da Vernci Code Coming soon to a fellowship near you.

Reinventing the Hula Hoop.

473 x 17.5 = Uhmm...a big number. Isn't that just tremendous?

Please allow me to sum it up for you. Once upon a time, there was a guy named Wierwille who claimed he had a doctorate. He lied. It was a mail order phony. The End. (They all lived happily ever after.)

Allow me to state this in the simplest way possible,. This statement is simply false. Error after error after error has been scrutinized here. Thread upon thread upon thread has dissected these errors in great detail. It's really not my fault you've chosen to reject the obvious. To demonstrate my point, suppose you select any "error" of your choosing and "go over it with great care" to demonstrate why our conclusions are incorrect. I'm not holding my breath.

The moon could fall out of the sky while we sleep and squash us all flatter that the winner of a Twiggy lookalike contest. Probably not likely to happen, though.