waysider

Cool!

I heard all this stuff 40 years ago, in FellowLaborers. Wierwille was supposedly getting information on impending doom via the revelation God was bestowing upon him. It turns out, The guy was a conman who was secretly getting his information from a white- supremacist, anti-Semitic, anti-Black propaganda group called Liberty Lobby. The jerk had less "spiritual insight" than your average Pet Rock.

I liked the song.

It's ironic. While I was in, I thought I was seeing everything so clearly but, reality was obscured.

Two hours and eighteen minutes. I'll pass.

You got that right, sister! :P

Something else to consider: Borders change constantly. Just in our lifetimes, think how many countries have changed their geographic boundaries. The town where my grandfather was born still exists but, it's now part of a country other than the one in which he was born.

Problems with cross language translations: HERE

Sweet!

You said you didn't see how it could be harmful. I gave an example. Now, bear in mind, I didn't say that it's always harmful. This example, however, shows how this practice can be misused and generate harm. This whole thread wouldn't even be necessary if Wierwille hadn't made such a big deal out of inventing meanings for dechomai and lambano to suit his own agenda. Lambano..Laballo...Ballo...Throw....Throw the whole thing out.

"I don't really see a way in which this would be a harmful recommendation." Really? How about dechomai/lambano? (Pertains directly to the subject of the thread.)

"What weather hits the US usually arrives in Europe about 2 weeks later. Not usually the same strength, but generally much wetter after the long journey over the intervening ocean." Interesting. I never realized that before. Glad everyone is okay.

Sometimes you hear what you want to hear, despite what's being said. At 21 years old and struggling financially, I was primed to accept what Wierwille was hawking, even though, in retrospect, I can clearly see how he took John 10:10 out of context, twisted it around and made it say what he wanted it to say. Then, he went to great lengths to support his premise with his own convoluted interpretation of scripture. I'd like to say it would be a lot harder to fool me now but, who really knows?

From that standpoint, there are two questions that would need to be answered. 1.) Are the people currently inhabiting the region descendants of the people referenced in the Bible? (There have been DNA studies that address this question.) 2.) Does the current geography coincide with historical records? ( I don't know where to begin with this question.)

This sounds more like an invitation to a political debate than a discussion of doctrinal matters.

Musically speaking, you don't need minor chords to play the blues nor will playing minor chords make something the blues. There is plenty of blues played with major chords and plenty of classical music played with minor chords. The concept that TWI presented is a disconnect from reality. Philosophically speaking, the blues, as a musical genre, is intended to make you feel better, not worse. It's another example of how TWI held itself forth as an authority on a subject it didn't understand. http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100108/full/news.2010.3.html

"Johnston believed Navajo answered the military requirement for an undecipherable code because Navajo is an unwritten language of extreme complexity. Its syntax and tonal qualities, not to mention dialects, make it unintelligible to anyone without extensive exposure and training." ............................................................................ What we see here is that it had syntax and complexity (structure). That the syntax and structure were virtually unknown does not negate their existence.. Phrased a bit differently: They didn't understand it's structure but acknowledged its existence.

Actors never want to admit there's something they can't do. I think that's one of the things that made Joey Tribbiani's character so funny and gave rise to so many crazy scenarios. Joey, can you ride a horse? Sure. Joey, can you ice skate? Sure. Joey, can you pilot the space shuttle? uhmmm.....Sure.

They were owned by Hostess and have closed up shop as well, according to news reports I have seen.

Someone else will revive them. If the demand is there, someone will supply it.

Sounds like a plan. I'm not trying to dispute anything. I'm just trying to understand the essence of what's being said. (I think my reading skills "ain't what they used to be.")

I must be dense. The context seems to suggest that "Fundamentalist" is a blanket term for a group that encompasses Lutheran, Baptist, Reformed, other Protestants. What am I missing?

Lutherans are fundamentalists? When did this happen?