oldiesman

I support the right for folks to read and consider an unpopular position like the revisionist literature without having to apologize for doing so, and without being labelled anti-semitic and neo-nazi. Thank God we live in America. This stuff is banned in Germany and Israel.

Wordwolf, I guess you can't help spinning. I don't know where Allan stands on his beliefs regarding this topic, he can speak for himself, but I've stated that I don't know quite what to believe regarding the holocaust. I support reading all the books, to get all viewpoints. I support someone reading the books from twi, to get the revisionist view. But that's not the same as endorsing the books as truth, or the same as being a neo-nazi or anti-semite. If you think it is, that's your problem. I support free speech and the freedom to read and consider opposition viewpoints. Please don't misrepresent my position. What I DO think is that there's an existing propaganda machine that uses the holocaust issue as propaganda, to have Americans fork over billions of dollars to Israel every year.

Of some.

Lifted up, not quite ... together with disputing the 6 million number, the books give facts and opinions for advancing the idea that the deaths were caused by reasons other than genocide. The Thirteenth Tribe advances the idea that some modern Jews came from the Khazars, not from one of the 12 tribes. That idea has not been proven false. What has been proven false is to say that ALL OF TODAYS JEWS or ALL ASHKANAZI JEWS are from the Khazars. That has been disproven, thru DNA as Wordwolf said.

Gaslight!

I have a load of cassette tapes and could probably part with some of them. What is the offering price?

Motorcycle Crash at Intersection

I agree.

hi grand-daughter and welcome to Greasespot Cafe. Thanks for mentioning this, I've seen Dr. Wierwille love all races equally, and Jews were always welcome in twi.

I asked the Greasespot God to remove it and it was gone. Poof. :)

That may be so, but the U.S. cannot control the pressures of Mexico, at least not in the short term. U.S. CAN control it's border, RIGHT NOW, if it so chooses.

More spin. twi taught that when and where one rightly divides the word of truth, they have the true word. So a group, any group, according to twi, may rightly divide the word in one area, and wrongly divide the word in another. That would mean, groups can and do teach and have truth when they rightly divide the word. Wordwolf stated: Still is spin. I think that statement is inaccurate and deceptive. I think Shaz (not Wordwolf) said it honestly and accurately, and I agree:

You're right.

Motorcycle-Car Crash Driver makes u-turn in front of motorcycle.

Shaz, that's not what Wordwolf said. But since you mention that, I agree with you. And I agree with the statement. When I was involved with twi, I thought they were the most accurate. BTW, this is not an uncommon phenomena ... I bet you a Quarter Pounder that most folks involved in religious groups think their group is the best, most accurate way there is.

I agree Roy, the leak should be stopped first before anything else.

I'd be interested to know what was said. Prayer or praise?

I make the distinction that twi believers (we used to be one) believed that twi was the best, most accurate, most rightly - divided ministry out there. There is no question in my mind that I, and I think most of us, thought that. But that is different than being the ONLY group with the truth. ONLY means the ONLY SOURCE, which obviously, we were not. I rejoiced when I saw other groups teach the truth. Examples of this are many. Books by Bullinger, E.W. Kenyon, Stiles, Leonard, Cliffe, and others, groups like Leonards, and the Jehovah Witnesses, who taught truths like that twi taught. Add to this ooodles of other Christian books. I used to watch Fred Price all the time while I was in twi, and really enjoy it. Even the church of my youth teaches truth. Wordwolf if you can't see the distinction, you are either mentally retarded or engaging in spinning again. I think the latter, because you're an intelligent guy.

The way I understand it, speaking in tongues is praying in the spirit, and giving of thanks, among other things. When we pray, we not only pray for ourselves, but others as well. Speaking in tongues is speaking and praying in the spirit. What exactly is expressed one does not know since it is tongues, but God looks on the heart, and Romans says God (and/or Christ) makes intercession for the saints through the spirit according to the will of God. That is why it can be reasoned, when one speaks in tongues, one may be praying for someone.

Well I just hope you don't punish all bikers because of the blatant ones with bad manners.

Old old inaccurate spin. How can they teach they are the ONLY ones with the truth, when the teachings were a compilation of others' works that Dr. Wierwille himself admitted, when he said "lots of the stuff I teach is not original"? I suppose when he says something that doesn't fit with your theories it means nothing to you. Just ignore the parts that don't fit.

I agree jr4jc. Even tho McDonald's didn't invent the hamburger, I enjoy eating those mouth watering quarter pounders.

Yes it is quite possible that the bike was going above the speed limit. Even so, the car should look twice and if there is a bike on the road, let the bike go first unless it's way way in the distance. Not being in such a hurry is far better than having an accident. Lots of times when these things happen, the biker isn't going over the speed limit. But the driver just doesn't see the bike! Driver isn't thinking on driving but has his mind on things other than driving safely. But that's why they tell us bikers to wear conspicuous clothing, have strong lighting, beep horns, to help lessen the chances. And use the SEE method to get out of jams (S=SURVEY, E=EVALUATE, E=EXECUTE.) Expect the worst and know what to do to get out of it, if you can. :)

Thats what happens when you're addicted. :) Have a great weekend, one and all. And remember... LOOK... LOOK... AND LOOK AGAIN...