dmiller

Sung to the tune of "Old MacDonald --- Ole Doc Wierwille had a farm e-i-e-i-oh and on this farm he ran a class e-i-e-i-oh Foundational here Intermediate there Advanced, Advanced, Advanced, Advanced! Ole Doc Wiewille ran a class e-i-e-i-oh On this farm he had some twigs e-i-e-i-oh Fed em slop, just like pigs e-i-e-i-oh All they heard was I'ts The Word! I'm telling you, just like I heard God taught me, and I'll teach you e-i-e-i-oh On this farm he had some corp e-i-e-i-oh They gave their all, he wanted more e-i-e-i-oh from early dawn to late midnight they had to work to "get it right" slaves a'toiling no end in sight e-i-e-i-oh A motorcoach was on the farm e-i-e-i-oh at first no one saw any harm e-i-e-i-oh some went in, then more and more soon all knew what that coach was for because of it's *revolving* door e-i-e-i-oh There was a class PFAL e-i-e-i-oh "showed" the way to Heavan from Hell e-i-e-i-oh Guarenteed to open eyes But that whole class was plagiarized Ole Doc Wierwille conned us all e-i-e-i-oh.

:)--> :)--> :)--> Happy Birthday, Dot!! Where are you *hiding*, besides LES? ;)-->

Excie -- fill out this form completely, and they might approve you for posting on their site. When I registered, the rc and bc questions were not there at all. I got dumped from there, same as some others. Was going to try to re-register but -- I cain't do it, since I have no rc or bc!. :P--> Whew!!!!!! that was a close one! :D-->

Oh -- (ps) -- I forgot to add IF DOC WAS SO RIGHT?? -->

OK -- That is what I said, and here is how you resonded: You missed ENTIRELY what I was saying. Certainly that phrase *magnifies God*, but you know what??? It (as interpretation of tongues) is totally contradictory to what took place in Acts, the first time SIT, and IOT took place. My question to you was -- If docvic was so *big* on first usage in the bible as being the way it was to follow in the rest of the book, why did he teach something that goes contradictory to the first usage of SIT, and IOT?? Prophecy is a message from God, and tongues is a message for God. As I said -- the *my children* intro to an interpretation doesn't fit into the message for God *scheme of things*, that was evident in Acts -- and in it's first usage. Now --- How did Doc miss that, and still propound *first usage supremecy*??

OH -- Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!! :(--> :(--> Yer not going WOW again, are ya??????

I think that's a typo, just leave off the "og" :D--> :D--> :D--> :D--> :D--> LMAO!!!

JT -- it's Rocky Roccoco and he faced off against Nick Danger, Third Eye. I'm thinking this was on the All Hail Marx and Lennon album that Firesign did, but it's been so long since I heard it, I'm not sure now. We used to listen to that constantly. It was kinda like the *class*, ya know? Everytime you heard it, some new *revelation* popped out that you missed in the previous *session*. :D--> :D-->

Radar -- no, you don't. :(--> Judas sold out for 30 pieces of silver. I can just see twi breaking their backs to sell out too if enough money was headed for their pockets.

I have never bought a lottery ticket, and probably never will --- but that's just cause I don't want to, and has nothing to do with whether or not it is *spiritually wrong*. If you want to spend your money on tickets, go ahead. I've got other things that I waste my money on! :D--> You brought something to mind Cowgirl, that I haven't thought of for years. Anyone else besides me remember the *lottery* (woops -- I mean raffle) that twi held at the rock back in the late 70's, and the winner got a Harley motorcycle?? I know it was a "raffle" -- but isn't that the same thing as a lottery (in principal)? --> Twi *raffle* consisted of: 1) Folks spent their money on a ticket; 2) A drawing was held; 3) One person walked away (rode away) with the prize. 4) Everyone else lost all they put into it. State sponsored *lottery* consists of: 1) Folks spend their money on a ticket; 2) A drawing is held; 3) One person walks away with the prize. 4) Everyone else loses all they put into it. What is the difference??

Congratulations! :)--> (hehehe -- Look at him. He's got his hands in the perfect position for holding a fiddle, and a bow!)

ok -- Fair enough. Let's use Docvic's (or maybe your) *set of tools*, on Interpretion of Tongues. Doc was a big one on *first usage*, right??. What was the first usage of speaking in tongues, and the interpretation right after, in Acts?? If you answered *It magnified God* -- I'll give you an A+. However -- Docvic went on to teach that tongues and interpretaton was a message from God or for God and that directly contradicts Acts (in the first usage) --- where it was a *message* To God As Praise. If you hold a fellowship in your home, and have manifestations, and call on someone to speak in tongues and then interperet, their interpretation better not start out with "My Children" -- cause if it does -- you all are doing something that is not in the book of Acts, but are following veepee's teaching. Whenever I hear *My Children* in a believer's meeting --- IT IS PROPHECY! Doen't believe me?? Take a look at Acts 2:11 -- where the witnesses of the Apostles speaking in tongues gave witness to the fact that the Apostles were praising God , NOT giving a message from God. Doc Vic got this one wrong too --- PLAIN AND SIMPLE. Now --- if you have verses showing me otherwise, or if you even have docvic saying otherwise, I will listen. Trouble is -- I sat through those classes, and I know what he said. He is in diametric opposition to the Word, and you are saying what he says is *God-breathed*. Which *god* --- Mike ??????????????????

I attended my prom, but in typical dmiller fashion. It was (of course) a suit and tie affair, but I had no date, no prospects for one, nor any wish to wear a suit and tie. So me and a couple of my buddies showed up at the *festivities* (this was in Bloomington, Indiana -- held at Memorial Hall of Indiana University, 1969), wearing our army surplus coats, jeans, and demanding entrance, since we had tickets! Needless to say we were turned away quicker than a GreaseSpotter would have been at Hdqtrs!! :D--> We burned our prom invitations there on the front steps , and then moseyed on down to a *people's park* a block or two away, where wine bottles, and music were a happening thing -- and much more fun than the prom inside Memorial Hall. Yup -- I went to my prom. But they did not want me. Fast forward to my 25th class reunion --- I did go to it (and actually behaved for once), and I was appalled at how some of the classmates looked (like you mentioned Galen). Some looked like they hadn't aged a year, and but most looked like they had spent their life being *crash test dummies*. Again -- I was not wearing suit and tie, though I was *dressed up* (my idea of *dress-up* is wearing a shirt with buttons on it), :D--> but many were wearing the suits -- and unsuccessfully trying to look successful, befitting their status as an *adult*, and trying to *be somebody*. :(--> I refuse to grow up. Always have, always will. This year will be my 35th class reunion. Meebe I'll mosey on down to Indiana, and see what they are like now. I bet it's not much different.

"Who We Are" ?? Hmmm. Not sure about that, but I will settle for "Who We Were". And that is more than I would care to admit to in public!

I'm still trying to figure out who this guy Van Til is. Is he a so-so unitarian also? --> I've not seen any posts by Van yet, but I think his brothers Fu and Hos post here at GS frequently. :)-->

Hmmm. I was there in the *good old days*, and I guess your "toolset" is kept right on your "table of challenge", eh? Here is an assignment for you. You said: Show me your verses (not docvic-speak) where this is called a *law*. I know you can find it in pfal, but not in the bible. :)--> But since you think the bible to be *flawed*, and pfal to be *god-breathed*, I don't expect this assignment to be completed. :(-->

Geez -- I didn't know I had an assignment due. --> And while I am at it -- do you mean the *return*, or the *rapture*? I confess to inter-changingly using the two terms myself, even though I know better. :)-->

Exactly. No one was willing (allowed) to deal with questions on a personal level. All answers had to come from *upstairs*. And hey -- if this class didn't answer all your questions, we've got a bunch more for you to sign up for. Meebe one of them will give you answers. -->

Guess they have to do something to keep the interest there. They have little else to offer.

Amen to that! :)-->

I saw it on the ABC early morning news an hour or so ago. They gave no motive for it either. Just mentioned it, and gave credits for his work.

I agree. They have made this abundantly clear.

oh -- and ps --- you said Minnesota is billed as the *Land of 10,000 Lakes*. It would more appropriatly be called the *Land of 10,000 Taxes*. -->

So you did get the house then -- eh?? Good for you, and good luck in the move! Word of warning --- Yer closer to WhiteDove now, and I hear he likes to barbecue! :D--> Keep those wings flappin, and congrats! ;)-->

No need to go to Young's (although --I've got one around here somewhere --> ) Thessalonians is good enough for me. :)-->