dmiller

Did he have one of these, on the back of his bus? ?? ;)

Lovely! Wonderful! And even exquisite! :) (and you decide what qualifies --- right?????) <_<

So --- $2.50 for three cans is too much? :unsure:

:) :) :)

Thanks for those links, Keith. :)

I'm liking Live chat better, and better myself. ;)

And let me clarify this ---- If I am given a gift, it behooves me to utilize it fully. That in NO way detracts from the giver. But then again -- that is just IMO. :)

No Mike -- you missed my point entirely. I was quoting you something that was printed by twi (you DO like print over tape -- eh??. What I quoted you from the U of L, was from the syllabus, printed by twi, and not from the tapes themselves. Shucks -- scuze me for *fooling* you. I just figured that if you could call pfal and the way rag, *God's Word Re-Issued*, simply because twi had it in print -- I figured you could do the same, with something else that they also printed -- IE -- from what I've seen you saying in many earlier posts. If ya want to *duck and dodge* (like we've seen you do in the past), have at it. It won't be anything new. :( My ONLY POINT about the U of L syllabus was that it was something that twi PRINTED --- (not once did I quote the tapes -- in deference to your *written* specifications) Geeezzz -- I try and accomodate ya -- and this is what I get. :unsure:

I can't agree with this. By *changing* them from *gifts* to *manifestations* (and the definition thereof) is something that is *PI* on your part -- just my IMO. .

Death-bed confession?? I think so too.

Can't send the stuff, without an addy. ;)

I wonder how much *credibility I have ever had, on threads like this? Seems to me, that every time someone mentions something from a tape -- you are quick to shoot it down, thus my use of the word *castigate*. And no -- I am NOT going to search past threads for proof of what I claim you have said. I don't have time, I don't care, and you would refute whatever I might offer as evidence. Now -- while we are the subject of tapes, I just received the latest one from CES/STFI in the mail the other day, and John Schoenheit happens to be teaching this one about relationships. I won't bore you with the details of all that was on it, but I would like to tell you about an astute statement he made, concerning what someone believes, as pertains to doctrine. He said (paraphrased): The doctrine I hold, should be the engine that drives me to loving others unconditionally, yet so often, it is that very doctrine that constructs a wall between me and others. Thus, that which should connect me with others in love, is actually a divisive, rather than a connecting belief. Why do I mention this?? It suits a lot of us here at GSC to the *T*. You, me, and others also. The rest of the tape showed how to get out of the ~~~~~ *Me, me, me, My doctrine over all* --- and learning to accept other's viewpoints. Hey --- I'll be the first to admit. I'm guilty of that, but then again so are you. After hearing what was said on that tape, I decided to try a little more humility in my life. I've always admitted that I haven't got all the answers, even though some of my posts have indicated otherwise. How about you?? Willing to make your doctrine an *engine* that gets folks to listen? Or are you content with the alienation process?? Your choice. I've made mine. :)

Yes -- good luck to her. (I wonder how many cars show up at twi -- for them to need a parking attendant??) <_<

Excuse me??? All I did was mention tapes vs. written material. You have a penchant for discounting tapes (oh yea -- they are history) And lauding to the Heavans the *written word* (pfal) -- as doctrine. Since you were mentioning tapes (while having castigated a few of us in the past for doing the exact same thing), I just thought I might bring that to your attention, and you say I didn't *resist*? Resist what? Commenting on your flip-flops? Straddling a fence will only get you a sore crotch.

*Daddy's cookie jar* is another saying I haven't heard for a while either. And yea -- I agree with you Chas, about the *all nine* teaching. I have always thought that what was meant was that we were *enabled* to utilize them (as needed), not all of them, all at once.

:) :) :)

:unsure:

What a buncha B (as in *B*) & S (as in *S*). But hey -- free country. Think what you want. :unsure:

Thanks for the offer -- but I'll pass. ;)