Ham

I dunno. I saw a report about a polygamist in Australia, he had something like thirteen wives.. the locals were pretty "cool" about it, for the most part. "Well, if that's what they wanna do..".. one guy said with a chuckle.. "I pity the poor bastard.. thirteen mothers in law."

Socks.. It makes me wonder.. why did in this rare occurence the vicster happened to refer to Bullinger, he did so as suggesting Bullinger was a second rate source? That's the way I understand his reference in the class.. "there is one man who listed and collated most of these figures... didn't really take the field of figures of speech to it's ultimate" or some such nonsense.. the best I remember anyway. What's up with that?

Repeated self-hypnosis.. I wonder if speaking in tongues "like a house afire" and running retemories through one's head, all the while covering the ears and saying "I'm not wistening" qualifies..

I don't think it actually "makes more sense". Perhaps it is more plalatable than other beliefs. I think of vic's theology more as spiritually immature, sugar coated nonsense which goes down a tad easier than other perhaps more down to earth theologies. Providing one is young, healthy, and employed. But it causes more problems than it seems to solve. If you have "God in a Box", and things go really wrong, then there are more holes in the dyke than one has fingers to plug them.. vic's one size fits all positive informercial has a few problems. What happens when people fail to get the positive results that one asserts they can have. It appears to be a nice package, but where are the results? When was the last time someone walked in and miraculously cleaned out a hospital ward.. or walked on water.. or raised the dead? Or what happens when one gets sick, bankrupt, divorced.. broken down mentally..? One has to explain why, providing one claims they have "God in a Box".. On one hand, results are guaranteed.. on the other, no results are guaranteed.. "real life" is bad advertising. How many did loy slander and defame.. vic too? One guy who died- loy claimed the debil got him because he worked in such a "dark place" as Home Depo..

As far as cff, not the last I knew of. I believe cff's stance was that we should support those who "labor in the word".. no real heavy burdens laid on people.. but that's cff, or was cff The new thingy though, with vic extremism "pfal is our heritage".. where gramps is the kid's hero.. if they sow that kind of extremism into offshoots, I can see it coming.. I wonder how many of these "honors students" have anything more than a high school diploma..

Yep. That was me.. what can I say- "It's a living"

Somehow, I can't see the world beating a path to a broken down farm in the Mississippi swamp.. especially with gas prices projected to go over four dollars a gallon, people struggling to maintain homes.. families. A person very well may find that with a bachellor's in history, they are still basically unemployable. The old guys apparently can't cut the mustard.. likely too old and worn out to take it out on the road.. but they probably savor the memory, of the days a little piece of the world beat a path to the huckster's door. So what are they really doing, "training" "leaders"(?) and "workers"(??) to go forth, and shake down areas of concern, interest and "need"? About the only place they MIGHT be able to harvest any kind of income or respect, would be places where people still revere the vicster's name.. "we agree on the WORD, don't we?" "well then. Forget the kids, the seventy dollar tank of gas you need to go to work this week.. "gawd" says you owe ten percent, as a MINIMUM.. you won't get ANYTHING if you can't get your foot off the hose.." "can't afford to heat the house? Maybe you aren't giving enough.. gawd can *bless* you. maybe you oughta try fifteen percent.." That little teaching happens to reside in what the "young man" regards as his "heritage"..

Somehow, I just don't see the world beating a path to a little overgrown farm in rural Mississippi..

With economic woes, some of these hucksters may very well find themselves forced to take their dog and pony show on the road. They'll roam the countryside, searching for some little place to shake down, that will let them put on their power of gawd and casting out debil seminars, for a "donation" of course. "hmm.. that sounds what the last guy did that came through about a month ago.." "well, what can I say.. the debil sure keeps us busy.."

Don't underestimate yourself friend.. :)

I don't know how to answer all of that.. where did the fire go.. I don't think it really went anywhere. I don't think the fire is out.. maybe it's more focussed now for some of us..

I think you are brave.. a lot of people can't look that kind of darkness in the face.. you may find it isn't as dark as it seems..

hmm. Well.. does it look anything like... "This"?

I wonder how the underlings are expected to address the one in charge.. "the wittle itty bitty boy of gawd for our day, time and hour.." "the successor to his holiness".. and nametags. Will they have a proclivity to an over excessive use of nametags? Can't chop firewood without a name tag ya know..

and he LOVED the titles. Even in his dialog, he had characters call him "doctor" or "a man of god". I'm flabbergasted that people actually still refer to him as "doctor". I think they would call him "God" if they could get away with it..

Eventually, these meddlers will have their nose in every aspect of your life. Such as: 1. How you raise your kid 2 What kind of work you should do 3. see your bank records.. to "help" you of course. 4. Have you submit a weekly plan, when you will go grocery shopping.. which "believer" you will be going with.. and don't EVER deviate from the plan.. 5. Don't forget. They will need to know how often and when you are having sex with your spouse, provided you're married and all.. 6. And don't even THINK of buying a car, or a house, or anything "major" without their "input".. 7. Oh yes.. you'll be "busy". Miss a few meetings, and somebody will think something is "wrong" with you.. 8. You'll volunteer the use of your house, if you have a nice one, for classes, fellowships.. 9. You'll have the "honor" of being "requested" to clean leader's houses, babysit the kids.. 10. If you're on staff, you will be forbidden to have a "serious" pet, such as a dog, a cat.. and don't think of enrolling your kids in karate, or similar extracuricular activities. You'll be forced to live in a trailer or cheesy dormitory, and have virtually little or no privacy.. etc. etc... If I didn't see half of this myself, I'd think it was a work of fiction.. about half of that list was life in the way when I left in 96. As a supposed VOLUNTEER. a couple of years later, life in the way WAS the list.. I think they rolled back a LITTLE on a few items on the list.. But it all started as a nice little bible meeting..

I've heard people excuse vic's plagiarism by saying "well, if it was such a BIG DEAL, why didn't Stiles, Leonard, Kenyon and Bullinger publications, etc, etc, take action? It MUST NOT have really hurt their feelings or something.." Who says it didn't hurt? I wonder how Leonard felt, seeing his life's work cut and pasted by a second rate con artist.. he was well aware of the raw copying that was going on. I think he felt legal remedies to be more distasteful than the issues they would correct. So be it- that perhaps was his belief. The real objection I have with the vicster's raw copying, and not giving any credit or documentation- it made him out to be what he was not. A scholar. An innovator. One who by isolating himself like a monk, and after years of toil and study- single-handedly came up with something which had a remarkable resemblence to other scholars works. I think it's hypocrisy at it's worst. He actually got on stage, and said something like "you have it easy- you don't KNOW the kind of junk I had to go through to get this.." sheesh..

I think the participants are being asked to compromise themselves, far more than any possible benefit garnered would justify. What are those in charge willing to put on the table? Seems rather one-sided.. Without an established connection to a much larger organization, I would say they have little to offer. Or any grounds to recruit.. Where are they going to have these "leaders and workers" "go forth"? I wonder if the "survivors" are guaranteed a position in an organization "somewhere"..

It would be nice, wouldn't it? :) To me, they all smell like twi, to one degree or another. I think 99 percent of their certainty is based on a self generated illusion.. despite claims of having the power of God, along with the bold boasting that goes along with the claims, I have not seen anyone live their normal, day to day life any different than anyone else. No mighty healings, no mighty miracles. Some "results" I've seen them claim are due merely to the benefits of having a higher education, or having just plain dumb luck at times. Or the results of being connected with the community. I think MOST churches won't just let a person just walk in the door, and be a REAL part of the fellowship anyway. They may greet one with a smile, and open arms, but there are many requirements, many agreements to be made.. it's almost like one has to leave their real self at the door when they go inside, to one extreme or the other.

It might be a small question, but who are "we"?

I wonder how many offshoot teachers and writers really take this seriously.. the real originator of the work very well may only need to show a remarkable similarity to their own work.. "honestly officer, it wasn't mine.. I was just holding it, yeah, that was it.. I was just holding it, for a friend.."

Plagiarism is practically a one way ticket out of any higher instution of learning. It's also practically a one way ticket out of any "real" job or profession. They don't really care to characterize motive as selfish, lazy, self-serving, or just a "simple" mistake.. I'm not picking on you Jeff, but find it odd that some can find a supposed valid reason for it when it comes to religion. Why do some think that context somehow changes the rules? The same rules apply to those who use pfal as a source.. legally you must not only cite your source, but you also must cite your sources sources. That is perhaps the hardest part of avoiding plagiarism. Anybody who produces a whole book, or set of books without a single works cited page are not really doing a student or another writer a favor. I don't know how good a defense it would be to claim, "well, HE didn't cite Bullinger, or Kenyon, or Leonard, or Charles Welch, or.." To do any SERIOUS, reputable bible "research", I think one would have to abandon these works which heavily relied on plagiarism.

In the mean time, I'm sure a dozen or so emails might get his attention..

interesting.. a half a dozen other posters came to the same conclusion..

once I get caught up after finals in a coupla weeks perhaps.. :) why is it though, I could almost hear my emails being passed from desk to desk.. I'll find out I guess..