Ham

so how was da way safe, and a harbor, or haven? If its the presence of God.. I have a better reference from psalms. Psalms 139:8 b.

You say yes, I say no.. you say stop, and I say go go go... Oh no....

I could wheeze on for five hours as well.. does that make you feel "safe"? yep. this is what prompts the question.. "for WHOM was it safe? under what conditions?" Another observation. "the devil kicked my rear before I *joined* da way. He kicked it during my stay, and he kicked it after I left". (very rough paraphrase). so.. what good did your *affiliation* with da organization exactly accomplish? Let's not go into that now. I'm still waiting for the definition of tangible safety here..

how many usages of the genitive case are there? Even dumb Squirrels know that.. give me a break here.. was it "Paul a servant, of, that is to say, owned by Jesus Christ (genitive of possession) or was it Genitive of Character.. or was it..

Yep.. they must have been absolutely nuts.. didn't the mom have a few parenting instincts? I understand that they are supposed to.. what circumvented all that? anyway. what I'm still waiting for is a definition of just what the safe harbor WAS. Instead, I've been treated to dissertations of the victoid's research, bible(?) teachings about "love the sinner, hate the sin.." references to the victoid wheezing for five solid hours about the word "of".. and it seems typical of way behavior. If you don't know, or feel uncomfortable with the question, just ask another one. "you have a problem with forgiveness, don't you?" or something like that.. so. One more time.. why does the Porridge bird lay his egg in the air.. ahem. Sorry.. one more time. What is this "safe haven"? can you define it without a vague reference to some verse in Psalms? what was it? Who was really able to enjoy it? In a tangible sense, what was it? A safe haven from WHAT? Or who? Might seem like five questions. No, these are reasonable SUGGESTIONS on how you might answer the question. I'm not entirely accepting the ability to wheeze on for five hours about "of" to qualify..

If I'm not mistaken, he got his real break by marrying into da vicster's mob.. His "teachings" were probably as much a yawn-fest as the victoid wheezing on hours on end about the word "of".

we were warned to steer clear of other people's "stuff" that wasn't "vicster approved". One limb "coordinator" in California went as far as to BAN the use of Companion Bibles.. what an arrogant, moronic buffoon. The insult is VERY MUCH intended here. Well, to the buffoon. But his fader in da verd just loved him.. why the fear? afraid of what? That somebody in "twig" might know a few more greek words? or see the source where the victoid outright copied page after page?

Probably from page 543 of Bullinger's "A critical lexicon and concordance". Or from page 989 through 1002 of Bullinger's "Figures of Speech". Or from page 381-389 of Bullinger's "How to enjoy the bible." Or maybe one of the appendices in Bullinger's Companion Bible..

I picked my handle, because I am a ham radio operator. callsign is kb8pgw.

maybe your wern't all that.. that is evil and viscous. I'm waiting for those who know me to weigh in here.. what am I.. I dunno.. scary thoughts, isn't it..

so while we are on this subject.. I'm still waiting for your definition of what your hate/love is.. what about "sinner"? what is the definition.. is it.. deplorable, horrible acts against god's elect.. or is it.. transgressions against way doctrine? you know. doctrinal "differences". having a slightly different god.. or something. so.. what if I can't describe my particular perception of the Almighty within your particular confines of logic.. is that it? Is that the real *problem* here?

what I'm trying to figure out is.. why someone would DEMAND that we "love" an evil, vicious man.. don't blame me. I was just sent to observe.. Squirrels from the future, and all..

Love the sinner, hate the sin.. you know.. I don't expect "love". one really can't.. even if one is a "nice guy".. or less harmful than others.. it's really an unrealistic expectation..

sounds like just one more twi mantra.. what is your implication here? that I HATE vp? just that we understand each other correctly: you are saying what? Have a warm and fuzzy feeling, pleasant regard and "thankfulness" forda victer.. and at the same time despise the corruption, abuse.. thefts.. vandalism of good mens reputations.. perversion and rape.. is that it? Maybe you could define what you mean by "love" and "hate".

ha! at least they had the sense to know who to ask..

truth is a pathless place, isn't it really? :)

I dunno. Looking at the picture of the guy.. and even foregoing the video.. how can you take a fellow with no real eyebrows seriously?? I mean really..

the more you use, the less you have.. that's the key to everything, isn't it. I could have buried my last arrogant egotistical employer.. no, it would not have been worth the "investment".. "use it or lose it" really was, for lack of better words, a devilish concept, wasn't it? as it is.. I walk away, and his own children will pick at his bones.. can't say I didn't offer a few alternatives.. one of them was "buy gold. while you can.." and the dumb bastard just followed the market.. now.. considering he would have close to double his investment, rather than half.. well.. less for the kids to fight over, I guess.. sowie.

yes, I have thought of that. what if you woke up.. with da vicster's cajones.. between one's rosie white.. well.. in da afterlife.. what kind of fate will herr vicster deserve.. he seems to be getting a pretty good beating, now, as it is..

so where is the special "protection".. that you enjoy.. what is it? I would like to have the same..

John.. I am really sorry that you have gauged or measure your spirituality by the "accomplishments" of this numbnuts..

Don't compare him to his grand dad.. I hope he doesn't give us a good reason to do so.. still.. the pattern seems to be.. moggy is, moggy does.. Truth is a pathless land..

why do you think it is a dead(?) man that we(whoever that is) is, or are attacking? why is it.. that you give even half a damn about the old (ver, very ) old man's "ministry"?

and let's not forget number three: 3. A tendency to TRIVIALIZE any clear warnings and prohibitions, by redefining the terms as "spiritual adultery", etc. etc..