-
Posts
11,758 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Gallery
Everything posted by Tom Strange
-
That's why I said (somewhere around here) "take away the all of the hot air" and there's probably not much left there but an insecure shell of a man... but it is interesting that they both share a lot of those traits... Oh... and Catcup detailed over on Freud's thread that she and her husband DID confront him...
-
There you go confusing us again OM... putting something profound out there like this! (and probably closer to the truth than any of us could imagine)
-
Usually not women...
-
I posted this down in "Mikeland" but thought it fit here as well: In my opinion, PFAL (veepee) didn't so much teach me how to read and understand the Bible, it taught me that what the other religions were teaching me was wrong and that what veepee (and TWI) were teaching me was right. PFAL (again JMO) was a class presented under the guise of "unlocking the Bible" but really was just a way to indoctrinate us into TWI and away from the other religions.
-
how many times could "godwin's law" be invoked on this tread?
-
good topic chas... I'd like to know as well... (psst... put this question down in the geek section as well)
-
I don't know that anyone would ever expect YOU to accuse him. I think the point (as I see it) is that "I wouldn't accuse him since I wasn't there, but I wouldn't pass a blanket accusation of 'LIAR' on everyone who did and say things like 'rape didn't occur unless it's proven in a court of law'..." C'mon Jonny... of course that's a possibility BUT... if YOU were the one being accused would you just "let it go"...? I don't think I would or could...
-
And the other possibility Jonny? (to number one)
-
Lingo, what do you think of the two thoughts I posted? 1) Why hasn't LCM sued anyone for slander or defamation of character? 2) The folks who accuse him of it are not wrong so they do not fear the lawsuit
-
You have a point... but saying that unless someone is convicted in a court of law then rape did not occur is a lot different than the point you are bringing up... Here's one for you Jonny... the press and news media uses the term "alleged" because they do not want to be sued for slander or defamation of character IF THEY'RE WRONG... "Why should we be less responsible than the news media?" I don't think it's a question of "responsibility" (we're not the media) Here's two thoughts for you to ponder: 1) Why hasn't LCM sued anyone for slander or defamation of character? 2) The folks who accuse him of it are not wrong so they do not fear the lawsuit
-
To be clear, I'm not mentioning "his" sister... I don't even know if he has one. The purpose was to suggest that he mention his "thought" to a close female relative or loved one. Nothing was meant to be inferred otherwise.
-
-
I can see this as a viable option for some... He (LCM) might be hard to find... I'd start out looking for someone "sitting on a park bench..."
-
So what you're saying is unless someone goes to trial and is proven guilty there is no rape. You are just sick man... tell that to your mother or sister or wife and see how quickly you get slapped. Better yet... why don't you go down to the local Rape Crisis Center and tell them that... I'll fly to where ever you are and video tape it for the GSC... And you call yourself "Christian"??? And don't give me that krap about just trying to present a "balanced" view... A lot of your "thoughts" don't seem to be very well thought out... Yeah... and people who repeatedly make ignorant statements like OM get "RE-fried"... Oh, and you also will find as you read other threads that OM frequently derails threads with this same tactic...
-
Black Hawk Down Ewan McGregor Big Fish (amazing movie, see it)
-
(girl movie alert!)
-
oh man... george your skin is turning from green to brown! "fur" for "ver" is no different than "the temple of "broom"... there wasn't anything wrong with the clue... there's been a lot of them that I don't get until I sound them out... ...and even though I had to ride the short bus, I still think they're OK clues...
-
I looked up the definition of "HITTER" in the dictionary today. Here's what I found: hitter n 1: (baseball) a ballplayer who is batting [syn: batter, slugger, Pujols, batsman] 2: someone who hits; "a hard hitter" "a Pujols"; "a fine striker of the ball"[syn: Pujols]; "blacksmiths are good hitters" [syn: striker] This picture was beside the definition:
-
(just quoting this so as to bypass ckmkeon's ignore!)
-
I don't know whether he is/was gay or not... and I really don't know if he does/did hate homosexuals... nor do I care about either because I think when it comes to LCM, once you take away all of the hot air, all of the big talk... get him on the outside, alone... could be a whole different story... I'm not so sure he was stupid enough to actually believe a lot of the krap he was spewing... but he may have been and he did think we were...
-
yeah... next you'll be saying that you can't get "river" from rivet!!! ...lighten up... have a cervesa! (cuz you've been over ruled!)
-
speak for yourself!
-
come back and have a puro and a cervesa...
-
To CKMkeon (and other Wierwille defenders), an Open Letter
Tom Strange replied to Zixar's topic in About The Way
oh... no apology necessary for me (but thanks anyway)... stuff happens, I was just thinking of you two... fuhgeddaboutit... -
Wow man... remind me not to make Yoda mad...