Leaderboard

Some people see a sunset and see God. Other people see a sunset and ponder Raleigh scattering. "Proving" SIT might change atheism for you. It won't for me. Perhaps my reasons are different. It is noteworthy the refusal to use the word "lying". SIT is a small point. "I'm speaking in tongues" . . . "no you are not, because I am not" . . . "you are not, but I am" . . . "no you are not, you are just claiming to be" . . . "that's just you're perspective, you don't know me" . . . "well I'll leave you to your fantasy, peace" Kind of a bigger deal with say, disease. "I'm healed by my faith!" . . . "no you are not, go see a doctor" . . . "you can't make me" Or you know, how government works. That's politics. We don't talk about that.

It's almost impossible to believe this is an honest question. What good would it do to objectively prove the supernatural? He seriously asked that question. First off, it would win the person who proved it a million bucks. Secondly, it would in all likelihood end atheism for good. Other than that, can't think of a thing. How can anyone take this question seriously? "What practical difference" would it make. Sheesh.