vpw got it from Bullinger.
Genesis 1:2 saying the Earth "was tohu va bohu",
and Isaiah 45:18 saying God didn't create the world "tohu" (in vain).
So, we have the Earth NOT created tohu, but it being tohu in Genesis 1:2.
The conclusion was that something changed things to make the Earth "tohu."
Bullinger also noted the limited uses of the word "create" in Genesis 1,
and claimed every instance that did not say "create" was not an instance of
creation, but something closer to renovation or resupply (my wording.)
The NIV has a note on Genesis 1:2 saying that the word "was" is "possibly became."
I saw that in college when comparing Bibles.
You'll have to give me more information.
I have no idea what you mean, other than a reference to Genesis 1.
Someone said Lucifer made the first heaven??? News to me.
What I heard was that God made heaven and earth (the "first" one of each,
although, AFAIK, the current one is the same as any previous one,
plus any renovations, so this is literally the same planet, albeit one where
things may have changed radically so it is metaphorically new.).
The heavens included a hierarchy of spirit beings we usually call angels to make
things simple, and the pre-eminent of them was "the bright and morning star",
aka Lucifer. He became vain and desired worship and to replace the Almighty,
so he engineered a revolt- which, predictably, lost, and the losers were cast
from heaven to earth.
Probably as an immediate result, the earth "became without form and void."
Eventually, the title "bright and morning star" is given to Jesus, who uses
it at the closing of the Book of Revelation.
Mind you,
even in twi it bothered me greatly there's no chapter of Scripture that lays
this out in a straightforward manner. There's a few verses in Isaiah, a few
verses in Ezekiel, and a few verses in Revelation. That's hardly conclusive.
The 3 sections may have nothing to do with each other or the same person,
and the Revelation verses may only refer to something in the future and not
be fulfilled one way in the past and one way in the future.
IF the Bullinger account is correct,
then a possible impact of some kind to the earth by the exiled angels might
produce results consistent with a meteorite collision. Something would hit
the earth, the impact point would throw up ash into the sky, blocking out
sunlight. Plants would starve due to lack of sunlight. Plant-eaters would
starve due to a lack of plants. Meat-eaters would starve due to a lack of
plant-eaters. It's one way to look at Genesis 1:2, and it would coincide
with the scientists who believe a meteor collision wiped out the dinosaurs.
I once saw a television show simulate the expected results of such a
collision and ash-cloud. When the sun was blocked almost completely,
I recited Genesis 1:2 to myself-and noted it matched the simulation.
If the Bullinger account is not correct,
then things were made in a progressive order.
Curiously, it's the same order the scientists think things developed in.
Right now,
I believe the account makes it clear God's the reason we're here.