i can suggest starting with a mutual consent based-process for any adult discussion
...including doctrinal..
rather ordinary...and any good marriage or friendship is based on it
illustrated by asking: "any objections to ___________?"
if not...we proceed
if so...we negotiate til we find consent again.
"may i_______?" also works once all parties know how "no" is as important as "yes"
clumsy and countercultural at first...but eventually our original voice and vocabulary jumps right in.
...
so...i'll play canary here and ask:
...do you or does anyone here mind if we attempt to proceed via consent?
if we were in person, i would just wait a moment and give everyone a chance to consider.
here, i may have to wait a week until i felt everyone has had a chance to read and type their objections.
so i hope no one minds that we just pretend a week has passed. you can still say no.
...
and i certainly have no objections to your hermeneutic, Bob...because mine does include them...and not casually.
i mentioned a developmental hermeneutic elsewhere...which i feel is valid and valuable.
but i also ascribe to more of an ecumenical approach.
...
if i may ask...do you have any objections to comparing the world's ancient scriptures as a way to understand the bible?
...or pentecost?
perhaps even using that same historical/grammatical/logic for all of them?