GreaseSpot Cafe > WayDale Documents >
Lawsuit Section
Sidney
Daily News 11/07/2000
The Way settles suit with couple
A
couple who were former employees of The Way International have
settled a lawsuit they filed in Shelby County Common Pleas
Court against officials of the religious organization, thus
averting a trial scheduled to begin Wednesday.
The
settlement comes on the heels of a ruling from Judge John D.
Schmitt that dismissed only two of the six allegations against
officials of The Way, 5555 Wierwille Road, New Knoxville.
Schmitt ruled a jury should decide four allegations against
The Way officials.
Mrs. Allen and Mr. Allen claim they suffered humiliation,
embarrassment and stress at the hands of The Way officials,
and that officials attempted to “coerce” Mrs. Allen into
engaging in sexual activity with the Rev. L. Craig Martindale,
former president, between 1996 and 1999. The Allens resigned
from The Way in 1999.
Sidney
attorney Michael Boller, who represented The Way along with
Louis Colombo of Cleveland, confirmed Monday that a settlement
was in hand. “I can confirm the trial is not going forward.
It’s my understanding that all issues have been settled,”
Boller said.
The
Allens had sought $2 million on a claim of breach of contract
and additional damages on other claims. They also claimed The
Way officials defrauded them of money, conspired against them
and damaged their reputations. They claimed damages totaling
$56 million. They also claimed the “mark and avoid”
designation ordered by The Way leaders on former members
defamed them.
Defense
attorneys filed a motion seeking a judgment and dismissal of
the lawsuit, claiming The Way, is protected by the First
Amendment against most of the claims alleged by the Allens and
that they waited too long to make allegations regarding
coerced sexual activity.
Martindale
is named a defendant in the lawsuit along with the Rev.
Rosalie F. Rivenbark. Martindale resigned as The Way president
soon after the complaint was filed and was replaced by
Rivenbark. In September Martindale resigned from all official
affiliations with The Way. Martindale claims he and Mrs. Allen
had a consensual affair.
Schmitt
ruled a jury should decide the following allegations: that The
Way breached its contract with them by creating impossible
working conditions, including requiring Mrs. Allen to
submit to sexual assault as a condition of employment; that
she was sexually victimized by Martindale and others; that the
alleged assault against her was the result of a conspiracy;
and that officials of The Way engaged in a pattern of corrupt
activity.
The
judge noted that while the U.S. Constitution and court rulings
prohibit courts from interfering with religious beliefs and
opinions, courts may become involved in practices and conduct
among organization members.
“The
Ohio Supreme Court has determined that sexual misconduct by
clergy is not protected by any claim of First Amendment
privilege,” Schmitt ruled. “Similarly, a religious
organization can be held liable for failing to protect its
members from the sexual assaults of its employees.” The
question of whether the encounters between Mrs. Allen and
Martindale were consensual should be decided by a jury, the
judge ruled.
Schmitt
allowed the allegations to stand even though the lawsuit was
filed after a one-year time limit had expired. He noted
defense attorneys had agreed to extend any applicable statue
of limits by one month through mid-April of this year. The
lawsuit was filed April 3.
A
jury also should decide whether there was a conspiracy among
officials of The Way. Evidence
existed that Rivenbark knew of Martindale’s sexual
relationships outside his marriage as early as 1995, Schmitt
noted. Evidence exists that Rivenbark and another woman played
a role in events leading to the encounters between Allen and
Martindale, which a jury would have to use to decide whether
officials engaged in a pattern of corrupt activity against the
Allens, Schmitt ruled.
Schmitt
dismissed claims by the Allens about the “mark and avoid”
designation and that the defendants misused their fiduciary
relationship. He ruled that “mark and avoid” is an
internal form of church discipline that is beyond court
authority to regulate. Schmitt indicated he couldn’t rule on
the other claim because it would require an examination of The
Way’s religious beliefs. Other rulings prohibit such court
examinations, he ruled.
The
Allens operate a site on the Internet called WayDale that
offers “insider information” about officials of The Way
and recent events.
Other
defendants named in the lawsuit were John R. Reynolds, Donald
E. Wirewille, Howard R. Allen and Ramona Bidon.
|